Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jon Benet's Family Exhonerated

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mitch Rowe
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    Ask Stan what it has to do with anything.

    Anyone - "I think she's creepy" trumps DNA evidence. Explain the science on that for me.

    Roy
    What DNA evidence??????
    I will explain the science. DNA falls from the sky. DNA is found on JBRs clothing. Whoopie!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    What I think is creepy is to see John Ramsey dating Polly Klaas' mother. Weird.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    Correction, the sole prosecutorial authority at that time. DA's come and go--notice she isn't employed them anymore...
    Correction to the correction: The office of the sole prosecutorial authority- the Twentieth Judicial District of Colorado, which won't come and go.

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Originally posted by Magpie View Post
    Other than as an example of cosmic justice, what does this have to do with anything? There are millions of non-creepy cancer victims out there.
    Ask Stan what it has to do with anything.

    Anyone - "I think she's creepy" trumps DNA evidence. Explain the science on that for me.

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • Magpie
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    She had cancer.
    Other than as an example of cosmic justice, what does this have to do with anything? There are millions of non-creepy cancer victims out there.

    I'll count to three and snap my fingers...1 2 3 You can wake up now and read the letter from the District Attorney in post 7
    I read it. So what?

    A woman who never wanted to prosecute the Ramseys found a plausible justification for the (in)action she'd planned all along.



    the sole prosecutorial authority said that. In writing.
    Correction, the sole prosecutorial authority at that time. DA's come and go--notice she isn't employed them anymore...


    It's over guys, the part about the Ramseys being guilty.
    Far from over.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mitch Rowe
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    It's over guys, the part about the Ramseys being guilty
    How selfish. Its never over til JBR gets justice. And the world is convinced the justice was proper. Wich means it will never be over.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
    It's over guys, the part about the Ramseys being guilty.

    Roy
    Look at this everyone!

    Leave a comment:


  • Roy Corduroy
    replied
    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    To me, there was something creepy about Patsy.
    She had cancer.

    I'll count to three and snap my fingers...1 2 3 You can wake up now and read the letter from the District Attorney in post 7

    Originally posted by sdreid View Post
    Since John says that he has been exonerated
    He hasn't said a word, Stan, the sole prosecutorial authority said that. In writing.

    It's over guys, the part about the Ramseys being guilty.

    Roy

    Leave a comment:


  • Ally
    replied
    The polygraph test that they took was again, one that was bought and paid for by them, so therefore, the results are suspect.

    At the very least, riding high on that fabulous success there was no reason for them not to waltz into the FBI and take a real one.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    Not police ones, as I recall. You get what you pay for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    John has taken polygraphs and passed them.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • sdreid
    replied
    To me, there was something creepy about Patsy.

    Since John says that he has been exonerated, there's no reason for him not to take that FBI polygraph now.
    Last edited by sdreid; 03-05-2009, 12:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Oh my goodness, I can't believe I saw Capsy write that! Like Ally, I've read all the important Ramsey books (including their own, but not a couple of the self-published ones), and I would LOVE to believe Patsy was innocent, but I can't. I do tend to feel that John played no part in it, before or after, but that he later developed strong suspicions.

    One day, many years from now, Burke or someone close to him will tell all.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • cappuccina
    replied
    Patsy did it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mitch Rowe
    replied
    Anyones opinion that exonerates anyone is just that. An opinion.

    At this point the only opinion that matters is the real killers. Unless the killer/s is in fact a total stranger. If not then the real killer/s must deny the Ramseys involvement and we must be assured in no way could the Ramseys have known or participated in the murders with the true killer/s.

    If the killer/s admit that he/she attempted to frame the Ramseys and it seems plausable maybe that will explain the curious kidnapping scenario but it wont explain the Ramseys curious behaviour. The only way I could explain that is that the Ramseys were such bubbleheads that when the killer/s saw a prime opputunity they couldnt resist.

    Having said that if I were to be put in charge of solving the case today the Ramseys would NOT be my prime suspects. Because convicting them is going to be impossible. My only hope ever would be that it was in fact a stranger and we might find the match to the dna. My first thought would to find out where the dna came from. And my first thought on that is JBR plays rough with a childhood friend. JBR scratches childhood friend. JBR decides to go potty.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X