Hi, after setting up the other Wallace thread (which has over 350k views) I know there is some interest in the case.
My book, Move To Murder, was due to published last November but was delayed to allow Death of an Actress - my book about the Gay Gibson case - to be released in time for the 70th anniversary of the trial of James Camb for her murder.
However, today Move to Murder is finally published. For those new to the Wallace case, it is arguably Britain's most baffling unsolved murder. I hope the book will be of interest to those who know about the case, too. It compares and contrasts five theories, including a new one (by a poster to these forums), and publishes original evidence for the first time. This includes:
- the post mortem report that contradicts expert testimony at the trial;
- exclusive extracts from Wallace's unpublished memoir that provide his last known thoughts on the murder and his trial;
- the timing tests conducted by the defence but never used at trial.
And, best of all, you do not have to agree with my conclusions. You can deliver your verdict on what you believe most likely happened on the ColdCaseJury website. Will the overall verdict of the jury find Wallace guilty? Or will one of the other four theories be endorsed? The result is in your hands.
If there is interest, this thread will answer specific questions about the book. For general points about the case, see the other thread.
N.B. The newspaper article is from today's Daily Express (1 Nov 2018).
My book, Move To Murder, was due to published last November but was delayed to allow Death of an Actress - my book about the Gay Gibson case - to be released in time for the 70th anniversary of the trial of James Camb for her murder.
However, today Move to Murder is finally published. For those new to the Wallace case, it is arguably Britain's most baffling unsolved murder. I hope the book will be of interest to those who know about the case, too. It compares and contrasts five theories, including a new one (by a poster to these forums), and publishes original evidence for the first time. This includes:
- the post mortem report that contradicts expert testimony at the trial;
- exclusive extracts from Wallace's unpublished memoir that provide his last known thoughts on the murder and his trial;
- the timing tests conducted by the defence but never used at trial.
And, best of all, you do not have to agree with my conclusions. You can deliver your verdict on what you believe most likely happened on the ColdCaseJury website. Will the overall verdict of the jury find Wallace guilty? Or will one of the other four theories be endorsed? The result is in your hands.
If there is interest, this thread will answer specific questions about the book. For general points about the case, see the other thread.
N.B. The newspaper article is from today's Daily Express (1 Nov 2018).
Comment