This thread is reminding me why I think Julia Wallace is the best unsolved murder mystery ever. There are pretty much only 2 suspects, it is a closed sort of a structure to the case and while other perpetrators are possible, it seems unlikely.
So it is either Wallace himself or Parry and there is a strong possibility of 1 trying to frame or at least divert suspicion to the other. Also every piece of evidence can be seen in 2 ways thru this context. The most symmetrical mystery where it totally depends on how you view things, particularly since there are two parts to the story, a phone call the night before that set up either a planned murder or at least a criminal enterprise, and the following night when the murder took place.
Nothing is conclusive and it really requires some intense lateral thought. It is my belief thru careful examination, one can conclude that Wallace almost certainly had to be guilty in some capacity, but it is a remarkably tightly constructed puzzle. The most "brainteaserish" of any murder mystery I've heard of. Better than any Agatha Christie story and offering a mathematical sort of puzzle replete with various permutations, combinations, and probabilistic thinking.
I also like the "if...then" logic needed to fully realize the implications of small aspects of the case. Definitely a lot under the surface to analyze, details you might not have realized when first considering the structure of the story.
Pretty much every fact is accepted by everyone but it all depends on how one views it.
Does anyone know another case like this that is almost like a brain teaser?
So it is either Wallace himself or Parry and there is a strong possibility of 1 trying to frame or at least divert suspicion to the other. Also every piece of evidence can be seen in 2 ways thru this context. The most symmetrical mystery where it totally depends on how you view things, particularly since there are two parts to the story, a phone call the night before that set up either a planned murder or at least a criminal enterprise, and the following night when the murder took place.
Nothing is conclusive and it really requires some intense lateral thought. It is my belief thru careful examination, one can conclude that Wallace almost certainly had to be guilty in some capacity, but it is a remarkably tightly constructed puzzle. The most "brainteaserish" of any murder mystery I've heard of. Better than any Agatha Christie story and offering a mathematical sort of puzzle replete with various permutations, combinations, and probabilistic thinking.
I also like the "if...then" logic needed to fully realize the implications of small aspects of the case. Definitely a lot under the surface to analyze, details you might not have realized when first considering the structure of the story.
Pretty much every fact is accepted by everyone but it all depends on how one views it.
Does anyone know another case like this that is almost like a brain teaser?
Comment