I finally caught up with a case I'm sure many of you are familiar with, the 2001 death of Kathleen Peterson. For those who are unfamiliar, here's a quick summary;
Kathleen was found at the bottom of the stairs in her home by her seemingly loving husband who claimed she must have fallen, but due to the multiple head wounds and large amount of blood splatter, the police suspected she had been beaten to death with a blunt instrument (something like the poker that was missing from the home). Despite a weapon not being found, the husband was subsequently tried and convicted of her murder.
One seemingly bizarre suggestion was that she had actually been attacked by, of all things, an aggressive owl, staggering inside before collapsing on the stairs. But the more I think about it, the more this scenario makes sense. Does anyone else agree, or am I going mad?
Kathleen was found at the bottom of the stairs in her home by her seemingly loving husband who claimed she must have fallen, but due to the multiple head wounds and large amount of blood splatter, the police suspected she had been beaten to death with a blunt instrument (something like the poker that was missing from the home). Despite a weapon not being found, the husband was subsequently tried and convicted of her murder.
One seemingly bizarre suggestion was that she had actually been attacked by, of all things, an aggressive owl, staggering inside before collapsing on the stairs. But the more I think about it, the more this scenario makes sense. Does anyone else agree, or am I going mad?
Comment