Originally posted by GBinOz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View PostMost people are familiar with the Moorman photo, but here is what is claimed to be an image of a gunman. I'm always a bit sceptical about seeing things in what seems to be random mixture of light and dark, but this enlargement is more impressive than most.
It seems to depict a muzzle blast but JFK's head has not been hit, which would mean the bullet is in flight. The bright spot below the muzzle blast is purported to be a badge.
I think you're right to be sceptical.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Has something new come up since this piece George which seems to show quite clearly how unreliable the dictabelt recording is?
While the Kennedy assassination occurred some fifty-eight years ago, the case still galvanizes the American public. There remains a constant fight over the release of records pertaining to the assassination from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), QAnon
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by jmenges View Post
I fall into the camp that believes he was used by rogue CIA handlers (like David Atlee Phillips) along with pissed-off Cuban exiles as a set-up to blame the assassination on Castro. I believe he was outside on the front steps of the Texas School Book Depository during the shooting just as Hosty reported Oswald said he was.
JM"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
interesting. well what happened then? why didnt castro get blamed? everything seemed to go off with out a hitch if that was the plan.
Knowing tho Russia had castros back, this would have certainly led to ww3 and he chose to instruct earl Warren it would be better to make it look like the lone nut theory.imo'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Six_Days_of_the_Con...
Six Days of the Condor is a thriller novel by American author James Grady, first published in 1974 by W.W. Norton.
I read the novel before I saw the movie Dave.Last edited by GBinOz; 02-13-2023, 11:18 PM.The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Sorry, I forgot to post the link.
While the Kennedy assassination occurred some fifty-eight years ago, the case still galvanizes the American public. There remains a constant fight over the release of records pertaining to the assassination from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), QAnonThe needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View PostSix Days of the Condor - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Six_Days_of_the_Con...
Six Days of the Condor is a thriller novel by American author James Grady, first published in 1974 by W.W. Norton.
I read the novel before I saw the movie Dave.My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Originally posted by GBinOz View Post
Yes, the video addresses this, and is one hour and twenty minutes, not two hours as previously stated by me...Ooops.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joshua Rogan View Post
But if Oswald wasn't the trigger man in the TSBD, who was? And how did he escape the building without being witnessed by any of the witnesses?
PS Six days of the Condor? I thought someone said Day off the Condor earlier...is this a conspiracy?
That's a very good question. Baker said he heard shots from the depository and was on his way to the higher floors when he encountered Oswald. Presuming he continued on his way he should have found whoever was still there. There is some discussion about the lifts being operational. I thought I read that there was a power outage but I haven't been able to find that reference. But the floors of the book depository were stacked with books and boxes so I suppose it may not have been have been too difficult to play hide and seek?? Short answer is, I don't know.
Six Days of the Condor was a spy book made into a movie with Robert Redford.
There are a few parallels with Oswald.
Cheers, GeorgeThe needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
Perhaps one possibe reason why was that after the botched bay of pigs invasion , if Castro was seen to be suspected of any involvement, it might have given Johnson a reason to have another legitimate crack at removing him with the whole country's blessing .
Knowing tho Russia had castros back, this would have certainly led to ww3 and he chose to instruct earl Warren it would be better to make it look like the lone nut theory.imo"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
[QUOTE=Abby Normal;n803999]
got it thanks! did he also instruct the dallas police and fbi also to come to this conclusion?
Not personally.'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman
Comment
-
[QUOTE=FISHY1118;n804000]Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
got it thanks! did he also instruct the dallas police and fbi also to come to this conclusion?
Not personally.
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one.
Disagreeing doesn't have to be disagreeable - Jeff Hamm
Comment
-
It’s important to note that no one reported seeing any unknown person in the TSBD either before or after the shots were fired. This doesn’t mean that it was impossible for anyone to have sneaked inside of course and we have to accept that not every employee would necessarily have known all other employees, however that person would have to have been considered very lucky to have got in and out unnoticed. Especially after the shots had been fired and a policeman had immediately searched the building leaving employees at least aware of the possibility that the shots had come from their building which would have meant that the assassin was very probably still inside the building. We also have to ask about the extent of Baker’s search? Did he not search the floors and look behind boxes? If there’s evidence that he didn’t do this then he was certainly at fault. Surely he wouldn’t have ignored the fact that there were stacks of boxes for anyone to hide behind?
This alone makes a different gunman unlikely imo but I would further ask, if Oswald wasn’t the shooter but only bought the weapon to the TSBD, why didn’t he make himself visible and heard in the lunchroom at the time that the shots were fired? Or even better, why didn’t he watch motorcade from the front door with other employees giving himself a cast iron alibi?
This would hardly have been genius level planning. It’s page one in the criminal’s handbook…..if possible create an alibi. Oswald, if innocent, couldn’t have failed to have done so if he was innocent. The fact that he didn’t combined with the fact that he can’t be placed away from the 6th floor at the time of the shots just before he fled the scene scream loudly of ‘guilty’ to me.Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; 02-14-2023, 09:59 AM.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostIt’s important to note that no one reported seeing any unknown person in the TSBD either before or after the shots were fired. This doesn’t mean that it was impossible for anyone to have sneaked inside of course and we have to accept that not every employee would necessarily have known all other employees, however that person would have to have been considered very lucky to have got in and out unnoticed. Especially after the shots had been fired and a policeman had immediately searched the building leaving employees at least aware of the possibility that the shots had come from their building which would have meant that the assassin was very probably still inside the building. We also have to ask about the extent of Baker’s search? Did he not search the floors and look behind boxes? If there’s evidence that he didn’t do this then he was certainly at fault. Surely he wouldn’t have ignored the fact that there were stacks of boxes for anyone to hide behind?
This alone makes a different gunman unlikely imo but I would further ask, if Oswald wasn’t the shooter but only bought the weapon to the TSBD, why didn’t he make himself visible and heard in the lunchroom at the time that the shots were fired? Or even better, why didn’t he watch motorcade from the front door with other employees giving himself a cast iron alibi?
This would hardly have been genius level planning. It’s page one in the criminal’s handbook…..if possible create an alibi. Oswald, if innocent, couldn’t have failed to have done so if he was innocent. The fact that he didn’t combined with the fact that he can’t be placed away from the 6th floor at the time of the shots just before he fled the scene scream loudly of ‘guilty’ to me.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment