JFK Assassination Documents to be released this year

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Two witnesses, Helen Markham and Barbara Jeanette Davis, testified that the jacket worn by the murderer was noticeably darker than the one allegedly discarded by Oswald, and that the murderer wore a lighter shirt than Oswald's.

Herlock Shomes describes these obviously important details of identification evidence as irrelevant nonsense and complete irrelevance and someone who recognises their importance as obsessed with jackets.

It is obvious to anyone with the slightest degree of objectivity that the prosecution case against Oswald was seriously flawed, but not perhaps to someone who, by his own admission, would not have bothered with a trial and would have proceeded straight to the electrocution.

[Herlock Sholmes]

These people positively identified LHO. That should be the end of the discussion. For years we have had this kind of dishonest conspiracy theorist crap foisted on us. If the public were presented with the actual evidence there would be no conspiracy theorists. An absolutely perfect example was the London Trial. Twelve members of the public were presented with the case for and the case against and it was a unanimous ‘guilty.’

Most people who believe in conspiracy today haven’t actually read the facts. They have listened to liars like Mark Lane, Oliver Stone, Jim Garrison, Jim Mars etc. One new CT infects another one. If they were shown the facts conspiracy theorists would be limited to a few obsessive.

[Herlock Sholmes]

It should stand without dispute that anyone coming up with any kind of plot or plan would have wanted as few things as possible that could have gone wrong (especially considering the massive repercussion that would undoubtedly have ensued in something as momentous as the assassination of the President of the USA - just imagine for second Joe Biden being assassinated and it was discovered to have been as the result of a plot between disgruntled Trump supporters, the CIA, the FBI, the Military, the Police and the Secret Service?)

So let’s just compile a list of things that could very, very easily have gone wrong and which would either have foiled the plot or resulted in its discovery. I invite anyone to add things to this list. Let’s see how many we can come up with. I’d say that conspirators would have abandoned the plan at 4 or 5.

1. Oswald gets one of the other jobs that he applied for before getting in at the TSBD.
2. Linnie Mae Randle couldn’t attend the coffee morning so Marina and Ruth never learn about Buell Frazier working at the TSBD.
3. Roy Truly had already filled the post when Oswald applied.
4. Roy Truly wasn’t impressed with Oswald and so didn’t give hm the job.
5. Other employees decide to watch the parade from the 6th floor and Oswald can’t find an alternative spot.
6. Kennedy survives the assassination.
7. Someone not only sees Oswald in the window but takes a photograph.
8. Someone sees Oswald somewhere else in the TSBD at the time of the shots.
9. Marion Baker is suspicious of Oswald and detains him at the TSBD.
10. Oswald is witnessed killing Tippit.
11. The writing on the purchase orders for the guns are discovered to be forgeries.
12. Oswald’s being watched by the FBI is revealed.
13. Kennedy and Connally are found to have been hit by 4 bullets but there are only 3 shells on the 6th floor.
14. Someone turns round and sees the Grassy Knoll gunman.
15. Lee Bowers or someone in a car sees a man running away carrying a rifle.
16. Evidence of a gunman is found behind the fence.
17. Some photographer gets the GK gunman in a clear photograph.
18. Some home movie maker gets the GK gunman on film.
19. Tippit isn’t killed straight away and manages to shoot Oswald.
20. Oswald spills the beans whilst in custody.
21. Oswald spills the beans whilst on camera.
22. The GK gunman hits Kennedy in the neck and the bullet goes through to hit Jackie.
23. The GK gunman hits in such a way that it cannot be shown to have come from the TSBD.
24. The three 5th floor workers look up after the first shot and see a rifle sticking out of the 6th floor window.
25. In the echo chamber the conspirators are unlucky and 95% of witnesses believe the shots came from the GK.
26. Absolutely everyone in the trauma room at Parkland get a clear, close-up look at the back of Kennedy’s head and they all testify strongly to a massive back of the head wound.
27. They can’t find 3 corrupt pathologists. Or other medical staff at Bethesda.
28. That none of the above have an attack of ‘conscience’ and later spill the beans.
29. That the decision was made to go to Walter Reed instead of Bethesda.
30. That the faked autopsy photographs are revealed at later investigations.
31. That the faked x-rays are revealed at later investigations.
32. That the faked Neely Street photos are revealed at later investigations.
33. That Earl Warren and the commissioners refused to take part in a corrupt investigation (Warren was a massive Kennedy admirer btw)
34. They couldn’t find corrupt counsels/investigators.
35. They couldn’t find corrupt pathologists at the HSCA.
36. They couldn’t find corrupt ballistics experts at the HSCA.
37. They couldn’t find corrupt photographic experts at the HSCA.
38. They couldn’t find corrupt handwriting experts at the HSCA.
39. That Oswald didn’t request his sweater which allowed Ruby just enough time to kill him.
40. That Ruby didn’t spill the beans about being part of a conspiracy.
41. That Oswald survived and spilled the beans.
42. That Ruby didn’t die and later spilled the beans (to fellow prisoners for eg.)
43. That they couldn’t get near to Connally’s stretcher at Parkland to plant c399. Or that it was absolutely proven to have been a stretcher unconnected to the assassination.
44. That Marina Oswald said that her husband didn’t own a rifle.
45. That no one produced incontrovertible evidence that Oswald was being impersonated.
46. That the ‘Mauser’ wasn’t clearly photographed…..leaving no doubt.
47. The Zapruder film is discover to have been faked.
48. That some comes forward with some previously unseen photograph/s.
49. After hearing the first shot a secret service man jumps onto the car blocking the assassins aim for the head shot.
50. Oswald agrees to a lie detector and passes with flying colours.

Thats just a quick 50 to be going on with.

Let’s add a few more shall we?

51.Oswald agrees to a lie detector and passes with flying colours…….
52. After planting c399 doctors find the ‘original’ bullet leaving them with 2 whole bullets, the fragments and the missed shot, ie 4 bullets but only 3 shells.
53. Oswald, for whatever reason, loses his job at the TSBD before the assassination.
54. Oswald’s visa request on the 27th of September goes through and he ends up living in Cuba.
55. The JP at Parkland overrules Burkley and tells them that the autopsy has to be done in Dallas.
56. An employee enters the 6th floor as Oswald is shooting the President.
57. An employee enters the 6th floor as Oswald is stashing the rifle.


So we’re up to 57 very, very simple, very, very obvious things that could easily have gone wrong to either scupper the assassination or that could have led to it being uncovered. And our brilliant conspirators didn’t consider any of them or they were too stupid to spot them.

None of our residents conspiracists respond of course. We expect that kind of cowardice. The above proves….not suggest suggests but absolutely proves that there was no conspiracy. It’s simply impossible that conspirators would have gone ahead with this kind of plot. It’s just silly. Even if three men were planning a bank robbery and they had a tenth of the above that could go wrong they would have abandoned their plan.

And yet we are asked to believe that plotters involving the government, the CIA, the FBI, the Military and the Secret Service missed or ignored the above points.

Not a chance in the world.

Impossible. A CT’s on here won’t answer because then know how dumb it makes them look.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Two witnesses, Helen Markham and Barbara Jeanette Davis, testified that the jacket worn by the murderer was noticeably darker than the one allegedly discarded by Oswald, and that the murderer wore a lighter shirt than Oswald's.

Herlock Shomes describes these obviously important details of identification evidence as irrelevant nonsense and complete irrelevance and someone who recognises their importance as obsessed with jackets.

It is obvious to anyone with the slightest degree of objectivity that the prosecution case against Oswald was seriously flawed, but not perhaps to someone who, by his own admission, would not have bothered with a trial and would have proceeded straight to the electrocution.

They identified Oswald. All of these witnesses can’t all have been wrong. How can 8 or 9 or 10 witnesses have all been wrong. You’re living on fantasy island. Oswald was guiltier than Crippen.

[Herlock Sholmes]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jl3gP_4zPec/Tvw903IEBrI/AAAAAAAABxE/iZMedorwyFs/s1500-h/Robert-Edwards-Affidavit.gif

Someone else that saw Oswald in the 6th floor window.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Another man seen firing from the 6th floor window.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-1AqnPYPurw4/Tvw05Jp8R-I/AAAAAAAABrw/WzeDHTVG2lc/s1500-h/Amos-Euins-Affidavit.gif

[Herlock Sholmes]

And another one.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Dbm-V0gIjmQ/Tvw-c7G8FHI/AAAAAAAABxQ/Z0A5B9LkpTc/s1500-h/Ronald-Fischer-Affidavit.gif

[Herlock Sholmes]

All fakes though

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-jl3gP_4zPe...-Affidavit.gif

Someone else that saw Oswald in the 6th floor window.

Robert Edwards said the man he saw was on the fifth floor and wore a white or yellow sport shirt.

He obviously could not have been Oswald.

He also said that he heard four shots, which makes him an excellent witness for those of us who contend that Kennedy was murdered as a result of a conspiracy.

My guess is that you will say that Edwards was wrong about the floor, wrong about the shirt, and wrong about the number of shots.

And he is your star witness ...

[Herlock Sholmes]

Affidavit of William Scoggins who saw the killer of Tippit close up and identified him as Oswald.

How many do we need?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BQbn7A_np6w/Tvw_fSUN8oI/AAAAAAAAByw/fpzk85a02Qc/s1500-h/William-Scoggins-Affidavit.gif

[Herlock Sholmes]

Robert Edwards said the man he saw was on the fifth floor and wore a white or yellow sport shirt.

He obviously could not have been Oswald.

He also said that he heard four shots, which makes him an excellent witness for those of us who contend that Kennedy was murdered as a result of a conspiracy.

My guess is that you will say that Edwards was wrong about the floor, wrong about the shirt, and wrong about the number of shots.

And he is your star witness ...

When did I call him a star witness? You can’t get anything right can you.

As the men in the windows on the 5th floor were all black then I think that we can safely say that he was talking about the 6th floor.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Waddya know….another who saw a TSBD. He was probably an impostor though.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-8TcShKRfiPE/Tvw4TJarbuI/AAAAAAAABuw/O_zObxJNQAo/s1500-h/James-Worrell-Affidavit.gif

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Affidavit of William Scoggins who saw the killer of Tippit close up and identified him as Oswald.

How many do we need?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-BQbn7A_np6...-Affidavit.gif

According to Scoggins, the murderer held his pistol in his left hand.

Oswald did not.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

When did I call him a star witness? You can’t get anything right can you.

As the men in the windows on the 5th floor were all black then I think that we can safely say that he was talking about the 6th floor.

And can we safely say that he was wrong about the shirt and the number of shots too?

[Joshua Rogan]

Robert Edwards said the man he saw was on the fifth floor

"Mr. BELIN - All right, now, you signed an affidavit for the sheriff's department where you stated that you saw a man at the window on the fifth floor, and the window was wide open all the way, and there was a stack of books around him, I could see. And you just told me you didn't see a man on the fifth floor. Was that affidavit correct or not?
Mr. EDWARDS - That is incorrect. That has been straightened out since.
Mr. BELIN - What do you mean it has been straightened out?
Mr. EDWARDS - Well, they discussed it with me later and I took that back. That was the FBI. It was the sixth floor, though.
Mr. BELIN - How do you know it was the sixth floor? Sixth floor rather than the fifth floor?
Mr. EDWARDS - I went with them and I showed them the window, and I didn't count the bottom floor.
Mr. BELIN - You mean the first time when you made the affidavit you didn't count the bottom floor?
Mr. EDWARDS - That's right."