Did the famed cannibal, Alfred Packer, really murder and partially devour five of his companions in the winter of 1873?
After various explanations of the violent events, Packer was found guilty of five counts of manslaughter; but it was the accused man's revelations about flesh eating that earned lasting notoriety.
Some elements suggest Packers guilt: He was an unreliable witness, offering various accounts of the violent events
He was in possession of money and items belonging to the victims, whilst maintaining that one on of the party, a man named Bell, had committed the murders as he (Packer ) foraged for food. Packer claimed to have killed Bell in self defence soon after returning to campsite.
In Packers defence, no forensic evidence was offered at the trials. Various conflicting accounts of the murder site were in circulation by witnesses with no scientific/medical training.
I Believe that Packer was guilty of the men's murder, but did any acts of cannibalism actually occur ?
I suspect not. Cannibalism is not actually a criminal offence, but murder is.
I believe Packer tried to draw attention away from the murders charges with his outlandish tale.
Somebody who can devour human flesh is probably insane is a popular conception; I believe the MacNaughton rule was upheld at this time in law.
After various explanations of the violent events, Packer was found guilty of five counts of manslaughter; but it was the accused man's revelations about flesh eating that earned lasting notoriety.
Some elements suggest Packers guilt: He was an unreliable witness, offering various accounts of the violent events
He was in possession of money and items belonging to the victims, whilst maintaining that one on of the party, a man named Bell, had committed the murders as he (Packer ) foraged for food. Packer claimed to have killed Bell in self defence soon after returning to campsite.
In Packers defence, no forensic evidence was offered at the trials. Various conflicting accounts of the murder site were in circulation by witnesses with no scientific/medical training.
I Believe that Packer was guilty of the men's murder, but did any acts of cannibalism actually occur ?
I suspect not. Cannibalism is not actually a criminal offence, but murder is.
I believe Packer tried to draw attention away from the murders charges with his outlandish tale.
Somebody who can devour human flesh is probably insane is a popular conception; I believe the MacNaughton rule was upheld at this time in law.
Comment