Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is There No Definitive Book on the Zodiac Case?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    The zodiac was a meticulous ADA type who created complicated codes, bomb systems and letters. He said he would cover his fingertips with glue. He was seen wiping down the cab. I think its fair to assess he could(and would) also then disguise his handwriting and leave no finger prints.
    Except for the bloodied fingerprints left in Stine's cab?

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    Thanks for that Abby,

    I nearly bought his first book but went for ‘unmasked.’ And thanks for the assessment of ALE. If he wasnt Zodiac then he seemed to go out of his way to make himself fit as a suspect.
    Do you know how the History Channel series ended? Is it Case Closed?
    you mean Arthur Leigh Allen? lol. not sure who ALE is.

    Do you know how the History Channel series ended? Is it Case Closed?[/
    I'm not really following to closely not sure-I hear they might stretch it out to another season, so god knows when we get there results or final conclusions back. These pseudo docus really suck. I'm sure if its anything important well actually hear it on the real news. From my earlier post, on where they are now as far as I know:

    theyre focusing on two suspects now-Lawrence Kane and Ross Sullivan.

    Kane really has nothing going for him and frankly I don't even know why he is a suspect.

    Ross Sullivan has a bit more going for him. he worked at the library where bates was killed and the staff there thought he was her killer. Newly found handwriting of Ross seems to have a lot of similarities with the Z. also apparently the show has found new DNA evidence at scene of crimes(on bates pants and on gloves found in stines cab) and looks like they will try to match to Z and possibly Ross. I'm skeptical about ross mainly because they cant even tie him to SF area.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi HS
    I have both Graysmith books. The first one Zodiac is better than the one you read. he gets a little convoluted and hard to follow in the unmasked one. The first one is more concise. Hes reliable enough, a little biased to Allen of course but IMHO for good cause:

    He was in the immediate area at the time.
    Incriminating evidence was found in his home (same typewriter, explosives etc.)
    He owned a zodiac watch.(this "coincidence" alone!)
    He basically confessed to two people who confirm.
    Bloody knife in car after LB murders.
    He was former military.
    He had a (bad)fascination with children-same as Z.
    He came up as a suspect/POI twice independently by police (this is a bigee for me).
    Surviving victim IDed him.(another bigee)
    He fits the profile of thrill killer/"lovers lane" SK to a T. Loser, loner, no relationships with women (see Son of Sam).
    He fits witness descriptions. (to add-I don't know what all this talk of he was bald-photos of him from the time frame show receding hair line with widows peak).

    obviously theres more, but these are the main ones for me.

    Regards to the exculpitary evidence:

    The zodiac was a meticulous ADA type who created complicated codes, bomb systems and letters. He said he would cover his fingertips with glue. He was seen wiping down the cab. I think its fair to assess he could(and would) also then disguise his handwriting and leave no finger prints.

    as far as DNA: Too early in the science and only partial DNA found anyway. He may have been wearing gloves and or used a sponge pad for envelopes/stamps as many people do anyway. The DNA could have been anyone who ever handled those items.
    DNA evidence way to weak to rule anyone out based on it IMHO.

    I'm not convinced he was the Z though, at about 80%. and definitely not disproven.




    no. theyre focusing on two suspects now-Lawrence Kane and Ross Sullivan.

    Kane really has nothing going for him and frankly I don't even know why he is a suspect.

    Ross Sullivan has a bit more going for him. he worked at the library where bates was killed and the staff there thought he was her killer. Newly found handwriting of Ross seems to have a lot of similarities with the Z. also apparently the show has found new DNA evidence at scene of crimes(on bates pants and on gloves found in stines cab) and looks like they will try to match to Z and possibly Ross. I'm skeptical about ross mainly because they cant even tie him to SF area.
    Thanks for that Abby,

    I nearly bought his first book but went for ‘unmasked.’ And thanks for the assessment of ALE. If he wasnt Zodiac then he seemed to go out of his way to make himself fit as a suspect.
    Do you know how the History Channel series ended? Is it Case Closed?

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Ginger View Post
    I read it a few years back, and found it well worth my time. Be aware that the crime scene pictures, once having been glimpsed, cannot be unseen.
    Hi Ginger,
    This is an updated version by the way. When Howard Brown recommended it to me he told me specifically to get the updated one as the extra information is well worth it

    You’re right about the photos though. Don’t read just before you’re about to sit down for the Sunday joint!

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Ginger View Post
    I read it a few years back, and found it well worth my time. Be aware that the crime scene pictures, once having been glimpsed, cannot be unseen.
    thanks for the recommendation...and the warning!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ginger
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi HS
    I'm not sure about that book...let me know what you find out as I don't have a book on the Cleveland torsos.

    However, everything I have read about it, I'm fairly sure that Dr. F. Sweeney, who Elliot ness thought did it, is the guy.
    I read it a few years back, and found it well worth my time. Be aware that the crime scene pictures, once having been glimpsed, cannot be unseen.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
    Fair point Sam although as others have stated Chapman as the leading suspect counts against it.
    Sugden's book is required reading for the content, not necessarily for the conclusions he drew.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    Hi Abby,

    I’ve only read around 80 pages but I had a skim through before I started (some nasty photographs by the way) and he says that it’s not a ‘solved it’ book. But Sweeney is most prominent I think. Also at the beginning he mentions the prime suspect (Sweeney) was proven beyond all reasonable doubt. He also says that he’s gained new info to show where the bodies were dismembered. It’s a good read so far. It averages around £15 on eBay (around $20 to you )
    Thanks hs.
    I’m gonna get.

    Also, responded to your zodiac post, not sure if you saw.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Doesnt mean that Sugden's book isn't the definitive text. It's definitely in the category of "essential reading", which few others can claim to be.
    No argument there Sam

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi HS
    I'm not sure about that book...let me know what you find out as I don't have a book on the Cleveland torsos.

    However, everything I have read about it, I'm fairly sure that Dr. F. Sweeney, who Elliot ness thought did it, is the guy.
    Hi Abby,

    I’ve only read around 80 pages but I had a skim through before I started (some nasty photographs by the way) and he says that it’s not a ‘solved it’ book. But Sweeney is most prominent I think. Also at the beginning he mentions the prime suspect (Sweeney) was proven beyond all reasonable doubt. He also says that he’s gained new info to show where the bodies were dismembered. It’s a good read so far. It averages around £15 on eBay (around $20 to you )

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    If folks were asked to nominate a definitive Ripper book, I bet most would unhesitatingly say "Sugden"
    Fair point Sam although as others have stated Chapman as the leading suspect counts against it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    Hello Sam,

    Long time no speak I’m sure that you’re right that Sugden would get the nod, my only criticism would be that he says that Chapman is the likeliest suspects?!
    Doesnt mean that Sugden's book isn't the definitive text. It's definitely in the category of "essential reading", which few others can claim to be.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I’ve just started reading ‘In The Wake Of The Butcher’ by Badal on the Cleveland Torso Murders. It was recommended to me by Howard on the JTRForum. Would this be considered the difinitive book on that case? It’s the first one that I’ve read. I don’t mean the first book that I’ve read by the way
    Hi HS
    I'm not sure about that book...let me know what you find out as I don't have a book on the Cleveland torsos.

    However, everything I have read about it, I'm fairly sure that Dr. F. Sweeney, who Elliot ness thought did it, is the guy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    Hello Sam,

    Long time no speak I’m sure that you’re right that Sugden would get the nod, my only criticism would be that he says that Chapman is the likeliest suspects?! Obviously Begg and Rumbelow would get a mention. I always wished that someone could do a ripper book with the same level of research and detail as Vincent Bugliosi’s Reclaiming History (on the JFK assassination.) If you’ve got twenty years to spare Sam
    Hi HS

    I’m sure that you’re right that Sugden would get the nod, my only criticism would be that he says that Chapman is the likeliest suspects?!
    that's because he only looked at the four suspects mentioned by senior police:Ostrog, Druitt, Koz and chapman.

    His research showed ostrog was in jail in france, for the first time eliminating ostrog for sure.

    he pretty much debunked druitt and Koz and favors chapman.

    I still think koz is possible and I agree with him that chapman is strongest of the four.

    I have Koz and chapman in my top tier of six least weak suspects.

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    I’ve just read Graysmith’s Zodiac Unmasked after becoming interested watching the first 3 episodes of The History Channels ‘Case Closed.’

    I’m a complete Zodiac novice but I have to say there appears to be a staggering amount of ‘pointers’ to Arthur Leigh Allen? I’ve just read that many consider Graysmith unreliable. Has Allen now been dismissed/disproven as a suspect? Has this History Channel series uncovered the killer?

    Anybody know?
    Hi HS
    I have both Graysmith books. The first one Zodiac is better than the one you read. he gets a little convoluted and hard to follow in the unmasked one. The first one is more concise. Hes reliable enough, a little biased to Allen of course but IMHO for good cause:

    He was in the immediate area at the time.
    Incriminating evidence was found in his home (same typewriter, explosives etc.)
    He owned a zodiac watch.(this "coincidence" alone!)
    He basically confessed to two people who confirm.
    Bloody knife in car after LB murders.
    He was former military.
    He had a (bad)fascination with children-same as Z.
    He came up as a suspect/POI twice independently by police (this is a bigee for me).
    Surviving victim IDed him.(another bigee)
    He fits the profile of thrill killer/"lovers lane" SK to a T. Loser, loner, no relationships with women (see Son of Sam).
    He fits witness descriptions. (to add-I don't know what all this talk of he was bald-photos of him from the time frame show receding hair line with widows peak).

    obviously theres more, but these are the main ones for me.

    Regards to the exculpitary evidence:

    The zodiac was a meticulous ADA type who created complicated codes, bomb systems and letters. He said he would cover his fingertips with glue. He was seen wiping down the cab. I think its fair to assess he could(and would) also then disguise his handwriting and leave no finger prints.

    as far as DNA: Too early in the science and only partial DNA found anyway. He may have been wearing gloves and or used a sponge pad for envelopes/stamps as many people do anyway. The DNA could have been anyone who ever handled those items.
    DNA evidence way to weak to rule anyone out based on it IMHO.

    I'm not convinced he was the Z though, at about 80%. and definitely not disproven.


    Has this History Channel series uncovered the killer?
    no. theyre focusing on two suspects now-Lawrence Kane and Ross Sullivan.

    Kane really has nothing going for him and frankly I don't even know why he is a suspect.

    Ross Sullivan has a bit more going for him. he worked at the library where bates was killed and the staff there thought he was her killer. Newly found handwriting of Ross seems to have a lot of similarities with the Z. also apparently the show has found new DNA evidence at scene of crimes(on bates pants and on gloves found in stines cab) and looks like they will try to match to Z and possibly Ross. I'm skeptical about ross mainly because they cant even tie him to SF area.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X