Originally posted by John G
View Post
There are simply too many coincidences of timing and distance, as well as logical gaps for me to believe WHW was not involved somehow in either the planning or execution of his wife's murder. If he truly wasn't, then it was an extremely tightly constructed puzzle. But I have to lean towards his involvement in one way or another.
Unfortunately, every theory has its flaws, and it still is hard for some to imagine how if Wallace was the murderer (and in this scenario he is still essentially working alone), how he managed everything in such a tight time frame, with no blood on him, drains not used etc. What happened to the weapon? I think the hints are too strong that WHW was behind it to ignore, despite all the mitigating points, which I find strong points, but not "fatal" to his candidacy as the murder.
If Parry was tricked into making the call, perhaps paid a small amount for what he thought was to help Wallace have an affair, then that might explain the "sexually odd" comment. Perhaps he told his parents what happened, and that's why they wanted him out of the country but still stood by him.
Comment