Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ripperologist 129: December 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • robhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Rob, Phil. Also, one must recall many of these lads were from Russia and they were used to "Secret Police" everywhere. It would be only natural to extrapolate.

    As the saying goes, "You were prepared to see 'monsters' and 'monsters' you saw."

    Cheers.
    LC

    Yes, I assume that Russian Jews would probably refer to detectives as secret police. I do not think it is too sinister... I think the term "secret police" mainly refers to the fact that they were "plainclothes" detectives, hence not overtly obviously policemen. When the CID was formed I believe there was some public backlash to the formation of a secret police force, partially because they did not want to be like Russia.

    RH

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Time for "The Times" on time.

    Hello Chris. Thanks.

    And thanks to you for the YIVO copies.

    The time I used was from "The Times." It may be off by 6 minutes.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    secret police

    Hello Rob, Phil. Also, one must recall many of these lads were from Russia and they were used to "Secret Police" everywhere. It would be only natural to extrapolate.

    As the saying goes, "You were prepared to see 'monsters' and 'monsters' you saw."

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Thanks to Lynn for his interesting article on the Arbeter Fraint report.

    Regarding Blackwell's statement about how long Stride had been dead, I think it's worth bearing in mind that the reports of what he said at the inquest differ. Two of them give "20 minutes to half an hour", but others say he thought it could not be more than some such period. Some examples are given below.

    In addition there is a report in the Star of 1 October of a separate statement made by Blackwell, before his inquest testimony:
    "She could not have been dead more than twenty minutes, the body being perfectly warm."


    ____________________

    I do not think the deceased could have been dead more than twenty minutes, at the most half an hour.
    Daily News, 3 October

    Did you form any opinion as to how long the deceased had been dead? - From twenty minutes to half an hour when I arrived.
    Daily Telegraph, 3 October

    I do not think the deceased could have been dead more than twenty minutes, or at the most half an hour when I saw her.
    Morning Advertiser, 3 October

    I think deceased could not have been dead more than twenty minutes to half an hour when I arrived.
    The People, 7 October

    When he got to the yard at 1.16 a.m. the body was still warm, and the woman could not have been dead more than twenty minutes or half an hour.
    St James's Gazette, 3 October

    The CORONER. - How long had the deceased been dead when you saw her?
    Witness. - From 20 minutes to half an hour when I arrived.
    Times, 3 October
    ____________________

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil H
    replied
    I agree.

    Phil H

    Leave a comment:


  • robhouse
    replied
    Well, I alter my previous statement. I think it is possible Special Branch was there. I also assume regular detectives were there... the combination of the two would have constituted "en masse"... and I do not think the person who wrote the article would have been able to differentiate between the two.
    RH

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil H
    replied
    Well, five is more "en masse" than four!!!!

    "En masse" is as the heart sees it!!

    More seriously, I suppose that a couple of SB officers PLUS constables could be a largish group!!

    Are you suggesting the reference could be to OTHER than SB?

    Phil H

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    hmmm

    Hello Phil. Thanks.

    "I assume it would be Special Branch who appeared en masse."

    That would make the gravy thick.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    thanks

    Hello DGB. Thanks. You are most kind.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • robhouse
    replied
    Originally posted by Phil H View Post
    I assume it would be Special Branch who appeared en masse.

    Phil H
    This would have been somewhat difficult, as from what I understand Special Branch consisted of 5 officers.

    RH

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil H
    replied
    The British have never has "secret police" as such.

    MI5/MI6 (post 1888, of course) operate secretly but use Special Branch (part of Scotland Yard/the Met) as their legal arm.

    I assume it would be Special Branch who appeared en masse.

    Phil H

    Leave a comment:


  • DGB
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello All. The Fido piece is a must read. Very well done.

    Can't wait to see how it all sifts out.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Very true, it's a very interesting article, which whets the appetite.

    I wanted to congratulate you too Lynn, not only very interesting but also put together in a commanding way - I think the field benefits when research articles are presented like yours.

    Also a word on Chris Scott's article. I really enjoy articles exploring the lives of the periphery characters (likewise the recent article on Cadosch).

    DavidB

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Fido

    Hello All. The Fido piece is a must read. Very well done.

    Can't wait to see how it all sifts out.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    guess

    Hello Rob. Thanks. That would be my guess too.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • robhouse
    replied
    I would say that the term secret police obviously refers to detectives.

    RH

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X