Another illusion shattered!
Regards, Bridewell.
Ripperologist 129: December 2012
Collapse
X
-
Hi Chris,
Yes you're correct - the photograph used in Martin's article in of the Aberconway version, written by Lady Aberconway and copied from the rough notes made by Macnaghten.
I agree with you that she copied the word 'seen' too early in the sentence.
Best wishes
Adam
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostHave just read Martin Fido's thought-provoking article on rethinking Kosminski & Cohen. Has anyone established what the word is which MacNaghten began, then crossed out before substituting 'the' to read
"This man in appearance strongly resembled the individual seen by the City PC near Mitre Square"?
It looks to me like 'Slev' or something similar. (Apologies if I'm barking up an ancient tree, but I've never run up against this before.)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bridewell View PostHave just read Martin Fido's thought-provoking article on rethinking Kosminski & Cohen. Has anyone established what the word is which MacNaghten began, then crossed out before substituting 'the' to read
"This man in appearance strongly resembled the individual seen by the City PC near Mitre Square"?
It looks to me like 'Slev' or something similar. (Apologies if I'm barking up an ancient tree, but I've never run up against this before.)
Regards, Bridewell.
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Really enjoyed Gentle Authors piece this issue.
As one who looks out for such things it was a joy to read.
Monty
Leave a comment:
-
Slev?
Have just read Martin Fido's thought-provoking article on rethinking Kosminski & Cohen. Has anyone established what the word is which MacNaghten began, then crossed out before substituting 'the' to read
"This man in appearance strongly resembled the individual seen by the City PC near Mitre Square"?
It looks to me like 'Slev' or something similar. (Apologies if I'm barking up an ancient tree, but I've never run up against this before.)
Regards, Bridewell.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Hunter View PostI think Chris has nailed it too; in more ways than one. His editorial was spot on.
Cheers
Chris
Leave a comment:
-
I think Chris has nailed it too; in more ways than one. His editorial was spot on.
Leave a comment:
-
hope springs eternal
Hello Mike. Thanks. Well, when contracts pick up, I'll see what can be done.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mklhawley View Post"...regular police and secret police arrived en masse." This certainly confirms Spiro's book about special branch being involved. Back to reading.
Yes I think they were actually just referring to detectives rather than secret police. We have to be careful in assessing the rendering of the Yiddish and sometimes not be too literal. For example, the reference to "little Jews" apparently meaning the observant Jews with whom the Socialist Jews were carrying on a running propaganda battle and occasionally real battles in the streets of the East End. It does occur to me though that it's probable that Special Branch was in and around the Socialist club keeping an eye on them, even if in this instance the "secret police" referred to were just regular Scotland Yard detectives.
Best regards
Chris
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by robhouse View PostYes, I assume that Russian Jews would probably refer to detectives as secret police. I do not think it is too sinister... I think the term "secret police" mainly refers to the fact that they were "plainclothes" detectives, hence not overtly obviously policemen. When the CID was formed I believe there was some public backlash to the formation of a secret police force, partially because they did not want to be like Russia.
RH
Sincerely,
Mike
Leave a comment:
-
liberal Britain
Hello Rob. Thanks.
An astute observation. The whole concept of secret political police was inimical to the British, as Bernard Porter observes in his book.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: