If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Hi Philip,
Sorry about the name spelling which will be put right for the next issue in April.
As Adrian mentioned, the WS Journal continues to meet its deadlines (as it has for the past 4 years), its the best value for money and your subscription also includes six presentatition per year free!!
We are continuing to make the Journal publication better (and working on the spelling!) and would welcome any new subscribers. Our latest February edition is already getting some very positive feedback...
I think it's more along the lines of dancing on a grave. Ambulance chasing implies there's still hope of life, something it's clear Ripper Notes does not have.
Let all Oz be agreed;
I need a better class of flying monkeys.
Pimping your mag on a thread of this tone could be compared to ambulance chasing.
Yours truly,
Tom Wescott
Ducking people you owe money to or are responsible to answer to could find some people in an ambulance in the world most of us live in...apparently not you or the Hansen fellow. There simply is no excuse for what is a 112 day delay in responding.
Hi Howard, long time, no see. Your forums are looking good. My comment was directed toward the WSJ fellows, who have not indicated that Dan owes them money. I'd hate to think you'd want to see Dan in an ambulance.
I would just hate to see all the subscribers (and I'm sure those from the on-time,every time, WSJournal, are among 'em too ) get clipped for coin of the realm....without an explanation from the horse's mouth himself. I'm sure you understand that position.
Well, that's right. I've just been thumbing through some of the back issues which contain excellent articles by people like Wolf, Tom, Andrew, and even SPE. This is an excellent publication in a classy format. It would really be a shame if this is its swan song.
Just a word of praise for Dan too.
He's always struck me as a well intentioned and fact-based historian. He doesn't suffer fools gladly and doesn't always suffer people who disagree with him gladly either - whether they're right or wrong. I miss his contributions. He has a habit of being factually correct.
If Dan owes you money, you might not agree.
Comment