Casebook Examiner Number 5

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Celesta
    Chief Inspector
    • Feb 2008
    • 1625

    #181
    It's a very positive thing to do, Don, and a good idea.

    The Examiner is so professionally done, and the look or style is one of the finer I've seen in any publication. Well done.
    "What our ancestors would really be thinking, if they were alive today, is: "Why is it so dark in here?"" From Pyramids by Sir Terry Pratchett, a British National Treasure.

    __________________________________

    Comment

    • corey123
      Inspector
      • Nov 2009
      • 1472

      #182
      Don,

      I am sure you must be getting sick of hearing this, but I have to agree with Celesta here, this magazine is the most professional and educating magazine that I have seen so far. Both in style and in contribution, and contents, all are of a professional air. With some of the best editors(yourself incuded), I can't think of ripperology without this magazine. Truly it has been a true honor being able to write for it and I hope there may be many instances where I have the chance to do so again.

      To top it off, you donate all funds to a charity.

      Thank you Don, Jen, and all at the Examiner for taking the time(which is very time consuming) to present us with the never ending gems of it pages.

      Respecfully,

      Corey
      Washington Irving:

      "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

      Stratford-on-Avon

      Comment

      • Supe
        Sergeant
        • Feb 2008
        • 955

        #183
        Corey,

        Dammit all, you are going to make me blush--and I'm a grown man for crying out loud. Anyway, thank you for your exceedingly kind words about the magazine. And the credit must be spread wide: to Jen Shelden, who runs the best books section this side of the Times; to David Pegg for his design genius (and some of the groan-worthy puns as well); to our assistant editors, Debra Arif, Ali Bevan, Andrew Firth and Mark Ripper, and to the Ryders for their business acumen and trust.

        Don.
        "To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."

        Comment

        • Tom_Wescott
          Commissioner
          • Feb 2008
          • 6995

          #184
          Originally posted by Corey123
          To top it off, you donate all funds to a charity.
          After my salary comes out, of course.

          Yours truly,

          Tom Wescott

          Comment

          • mariab
            Superintendent
            • Jun 2010
            • 2977

            #185
            Tom Wescott illicitly gets 15% more royalties because his articles ar so LOOONG.
            To be quite honest, when I first heard about Examiner donating all subscription money to charity, my first thought was “way cool and decent“. My second thought was “Wouldn't it be nice if I could qualify as a vulnerable woman?“.
            Silly joke aside, I think Examiner is an exceptional publication, and I can't wait to read issue #5. (Actually I even need to properly read #4 before that, as I didn't manage to give it all the attention it deserves.)
            Best regards,
            Maria

            Comment

            • Supe
              Sergeant
              • Feb 2008
              • 955

              #186
              After my salary comes out, of course.

              Indeed, some of Tom's recompense is deferred for tax purposes until 2050.

              Don.
              "To expose [the Senator] is rather like performing acts of charity among the deserving poor; it needs to be done and it makes one feel good, but it does nothing to end the problem."

              Comment

              • mariab
                Superintendent
                • Jun 2010
                • 2977

                #187
                Reminds me of my meagre salary in Berlin (which at least comes no questions asked, since it's a sponsoring by the German state. The Paris salary is thick, but Paris is so prohibitedly expensive, that it feels like the fattest salary could evaporate in a week, just for food.) Actually I'm so used to constantly be seeking sponsoring, that at first mention of “vulnerable women“, I saw "women“ and thought “I qualify for 50% of the part, now how about vulnerable?“. I swear I'm not joking.
                Best regards,
                Maria

                Comment

                • Tom_Wescott
                  Commissioner
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 6995

                  #188
                  Is there a woman who is not vulnerable? Anyhow, I thought the money was supposed to go to supporting the Casebook and all. I consider that a worthy cause. But some charities are good.

                  Yours truly,

                  Tom Wescott

                  Comment

                  • mariab
                    Superintendent
                    • Jun 2010
                    • 2977

                    #189
                    Most charities are good, when the money really goes to the charity in question, and not lining up some intermediate person's pocket (which I'm sure is not the case with casebook Examiner). Still, I completely understand why some people might refuse getting aid from charities. Often the charities' attitude is so condescending, that the people vulnerable enough to be in need of said charities will prefer to refuse getting help.
                    Tom Wescott wrote:
                    Is there a woman who is not vulnerable?

                    Vulnerable to what, Tom? I'm afraid that in this shithead economy we're all very vulnerable, and a couple of steps away from ending up unemployed and living under a bridge. With the big difference that continental Europe still features a social security state and decent medical insurance for everyone, unemployed or not. As it happens, I have reduced my German health insurance to the miminum so that I'm only paying 46-€ per month, which is nevertheless still covering basic dental, as well as basic other stuff. Seems like a dream situation for Americans, not?
                    Best regards,
                    Maria

                    Comment

                    • Tom_Wescott
                      Commissioner
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 6995

                      #190
                      Hi Maria, don't get me started on American healthcare. And I've worked for some charities. In most cases, only about 30% of the proceeds goes to help the intended recipients. I doubt that's the case with Don's charity.

                      Yours truly,

                      Tom Wescott

                      P.S. It's not enough that Don's been giving his money to women all these years, now he's giving ours!

                      Comment

                      • mariab
                        Superintendent
                        • Jun 2010
                        • 2977

                        #191
                        As everyone knows, women are the source of all evil. Still, I would have find it fitting if the casebook Examiner subscriptions went into some organisation helping hookers/drug addicted women escape their milieu. It would be quite fitting with the JTR theme, or not?
                        I have to confess I don't quite like the word “charity“. It contains so much condenscending connotations in itself. I prefer the term “non profit organisation“. The majority of “non profit organisations“ I had to do with were environmental, but poverty is still the most tragic/ironic predicament in human civilisation. We've come a long way, haven't we?
                        Best regards,
                        Maria

                        Comment

                        • corey123
                          Inspector
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 1472

                          #192
                          Hello All,

                          I don't think there is much a difference between "charity" nor non-profit organization. Either way, it is for a cause, and I think it is rather rude trying to say sending money to a "Charity" is condescending nor the fact that the charity helps women in need. They don't force women in need to get help, they help those willing. Everyone needs a little help now and again.
                          Washington Irving:

                          "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                          Stratford-on-Avon

                          Comment

                          • mariab
                            Superintendent
                            • Jun 2010
                            • 2977

                            #193
                            Obviously when I referred to “charity“ as traditionally/historically having contained condescending connotations for the recipients, I was not referring to Don Souden's attitude! As I'm pretty sure he has read A tree grows up in Brooklyn, The grapes of wrath and other lit from the Great Depression and knows what I'm talking about. Plus there is also abundant British and French lit pertaining to the duplicity of “charity“. As it happens, I tend to believe that a state should take care of its (temporary) weaker citizens out of civility and responsibility, not out of “charity“.
                            Best regards,
                            Maria

                            Comment

                            • mariab
                              Superintendent
                              • Jun 2010
                              • 2977

                              #194
                              I was also wondering, what is Marc Ripper's contribution to Examiner? Is he somehow a “new acquisition“? I was very impressed by his deep knowledge of Whitechapel when I met him in September. Plus very impressed by him as a person.
                              Best regards,
                              Maria

                              Comment

                              • corey123
                                Inspector
                                • Nov 2009
                                • 1472

                                #195
                                Hello Maria,

                                Apologies, and hope you a doing well this rainy week.

                                Upon Mark, he joined the editorial team. Along with the others.
                                Washington Irving:

                                "To a homeless man, who has no spot on this wide world which he can truly call his own, there is a momentary feeling of something like independence and territorial consequence, when, after a weary day's travel, he kicks off his boots, thrusts his feet into slippers, and stretches himself before an inn fire. Let the world without go as it may; let kingdoms rise and fall, so long as he has the wherewithal to pay his bills, he is, for the time being, the very monarch of all he surveys. The arm chair in his throne; the poker his sceptre, and the little parlour of some twelve feet square, his undisputed empire. "

                                Stratford-on-Avon

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X