Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Review of Holmgren's article in Ripperologist 172

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Okay so who is this? Why would they consider it to be 'our' Robert Paul? Apparently they are a 'professional' researcher

    Click image for larger version

Name:	robt paul - criminal record 1.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	55.9 KB
ID:	853432
    Click image for larger version

Name:	robt paul - criminal record 2.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	284.4 KB
ID:	853433

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post
      Okay so who is this? Why would they consider it to be 'our' Robert Paul?
      Note the trial date: 1 May 1871.

      This was held at the Central Criminal Court in London ('The Old Bailey').

      The trial record shows he was a 27-year-old sailor who had just arrived from Southampton aboard the Bard of Avon.

      It's not the Buck's Row carman, who was only about 13 or 14 in 1871 and can be found in that year's census.

      This same Robert Paul below ended up in Wormwood Scrubs in the 1880s. Wrong dude. No doubt about it.

      Click image for larger version  Name:	Robt Paul 1871.jpg Views:	0 Size:	111.0 KB ID:	853437
      Click image for larger version  Name:	Robt Paul 1871 Part Two.jpg Views:	0 Size:	171.6 KB ID:	853438

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
        Wrong dude. No doubt about it.
        Fair enough, like I said this 'professional researcher' was very convinced they had found 'our' Robert Paul with a criminal record as a 15 year old. The rest of the article about his wife and kids seems to add up.
        Last edited by Geddy2112; Today, 05:28 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        X