Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What makes Patricia Cornwall so special?!?! How come SHE gets all the limelight?!?!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • claire
    replied
    Originally posted by Khanada View Post
    Would anyone be able to tell me the answer to the question I posted a while back? I forget quite the exact words and don't feel like looking, but basically, who is tooting the horn of Bower's unpublished or incompletely published findings? Patricia Cornwell, or Peter Bower himself?
    Can't answer definitively, but I seem to recall seeing an interview with her somewhere where she said something along the lines of, 'these [letters] will be publicly available at some point, and then [pointing accusatory finger] Sickert'd better watch out.' She seemed to be under the impression an arrest was imminent

    Leave a comment:


  • Brenda
    replied
    Originally posted by Khanada View Post
    Would anyone be able to tell me the answer to the question I posted a while back? I forget quite the exact words and don't feel like looking, but basically, who is tooting the horn of Bower's unpublished or incompletely published findings? Patricia Cornwell, or Peter Bower himself?
    Khanada,
    as near as I can tell, all the touting is happening in this thread!!
    Most likely this Mr. Bower is sunning himself on a faraway island, eating fine pastas and drinking sunset passion coladas....and blissfully unaware he is such a hot topic of discussion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Khanada
    replied
    Would anyone be able to tell me the answer to the question I posted a while back? I forget quite the exact words and don't feel like looking, but basically, who is tooting the horn of Bower's unpublished or incompletely published findings? Patricia Cornwell, or Peter Bower himself?

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Then I suggest everyone gives Peter Bower time to publish his findings?

    Apparently its OK to slander the inocent on casebook without proof..

    But wrong to play the dads army theme tune!

    we live in a strange trans-american multiverse by all accounts

    Still its good to be back..

    Any sign of Norders experts yet..any names?

    one more time everyone

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    Sam You've followed this thread and `I expect better from you
    I was just pointing out that the discovery of the "missing" mas of the universe is no reason to cast aspersions on the scientific method - quite the opposite, in fact.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Science- smience

    PS PS





    Explore National Geographic. A world leader in geography, cartography and exploration.


    Answers is the place to go to get the answers you need and to ask the questions you want





    Hey Sam are we the privileged generation? This link is pretty old fashioned now. I gather that a number of physicists are working on a Multi –verse theory that will blow this stuff away…. but most of them 'haven’t published as yet'. Enjoy your Dark energy.



    THE DAN NORDER THEME TUNE EVERYONE!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Name Your Experts Again Norder

    Sam You've followed this thread and `I expect better from you

    Peter Bower has been unable to publish his findings in full, as you well know, because one of the letters in question, at the getty museum, is under restrictions, which will lift? well very soon as I gather, which might, surprise- surprise, mean another book on its way??

    well a wild stab in the dark, on my part...but perhaps more?

    I'm not stating Bower is correct..I dont know..I'm stating we should see what he has found, instead of throughing the baby out with the bath water..and beleiving Norders flights of fancy over supposed 'experts', that you know as well as I do...DONT EXIST...

    Pirate

    PS was that 17 demensions? or 21 demensions?

    I've just lost count of physacists willing to tie themselves up in string

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Pirate Jack View Post
    as to Norders God of science I suggest you ask him whether Newton, Einstien and Hawkins are all in agreement...apparently science has currently lost 70% of the known universe
    Actually, Jeff, that's because only science has the ability to have found out that the majority of the mass of the universe is unaccounted for. Furthermore, those involved have had the integrity to publish their extraordinary findings so that they may be critically reviewed and confirmed or refuted by others.

    Anyhow, back to the thread...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Leahy
    replied
    Name Your Experts Norder

    Originally posted by mac-the-kipper View Post
    Well I haven't read this thread nor the book in question, can't you just do us both a favour and tell me?

    P.s. I've just tried trawling through 7 or 8 pages of playground bitching and I gave up. It's just too tiresome to read all through the posts to find the names of scientists that have refuted Peter Bower's results.
    I'd give up if I were you Mac..

    The Norder has been asked again and again to name his experts that have 'Ridiculed' Peter Bower..

    And apart from Sturgis..who clearly refers to Bower as a respected expert and Hughs, who simply finds Bowers findings 'Surprising' the Norder has never come up with any names or statements to back up his slanderous claims against Peter Bower..

    The reason for this is that he has 'NOTHING' or he simply would have presented his supposed 'Experts' by now..

    Yet a number of newer posters continue to except this idiots claims as 'FACT'.

    I say to them..'GET NORDER TO POST HIS NAMES'

    Last time he gave a link to 'Stewart Evans' (Not a paper expert) who was paraphrazing Mathew Sturgis who was para-phrazing Kim Hughs..

    None of whom to my knowledge have ever 'Ridiculed' Peter Bowers findings..

    And again I'm not certain that the study of Paper and Hand writing is a science..??

    And as to Norders Ludite God of science I suggest you ask him whether Newton, Einstien and Hawkins are all in agreement...apparently science has currently lost 70% of the known universe...somewhat unfortunate

    All we require are the names Norder has seemed fit to avoid posting, so that we can investigate has claims for ourselves..

    How about it casebook? are you just going to take the norders word for it that they exist..WITH OUT EVIDENCE? not very scientific?????

    Good luck Mac the Kipper

    Knowone to my knowledge has ever got a straight answer from Norder on his supposed scientific experts

    Pirate

    I'm back

    Leave a comment:


  • mac-the-kipper
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Norder View Post
    If you'd read this thread or the other recent thread about Cornwell then you'd already know the names of several them, and of course several more could be cited. The list is pretty much EVERYONE not on Cornwell's payroll who has bothered to look at what she has claimed.
    Well I haven't read this thread nor the book in question, can't you just do us both a favour and tell me?

    P.s. I've just tried trawling through 7 or 8 pages of playground bitching and I gave up. It's just too tiresome to read all through the posts to find the names of scientists that have refuted Peter Bower's results.
    Last edited by mac-the-kipper; 08-31-2008, 10:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Norder
    replied
    Originally posted by mac-the-kipper View Post
    Who are the scientists that disagree with the 'Paid' results?
    If you'd read this thread or the other recent thread about Cornwell then you'd already know the names of several them, and of course several more could be cited. The list is pretty much EVERYONE not on Cornwell's payroll who has bothered to look at what she has claimed.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Actually I think my fave Sickert quote, which is dry rather than peverse admitedly is 'Come again when you can't stay so long.' I like to use that on people.

    Leave a comment:


  • claire
    replied
    This thread is excellent...it's given me a great laugh. First question police ask a suspect: 'Can I ask you where you were last Saturday night, sir, round about midnight?' 'Ummm, well, I was in France.' 'Can you verify this?' 'Yes, I was with various people, they will tell you.' Okay, next suspect.

    I had a copy of that book--put it pretty much pristine for 20p in a garage sale, where it was left unsold. One punter did pick it up...he made the best possible comment on it: 'Chuffin' 'ellfire.' Just about sums it up, I'd say.

    Leave a comment:


  • KatBradshaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Rosey O'Ryan View Post
    Hi Ms Bradshaw,
    Can you provide an example of Mr Sickert's "perverse sense of humour"?
    Rosey :-)
    Its Miss Bradshaw actually.

    Leave a comment:


  • mac-the-kipper
    replied
    Who are the scientists that disagree with the 'Paid' results?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X