Simon,
I haven't got round to buying the revised version of this book yet but, from the Amazon preview, I see that you have retained these two sentences in your book:
“Jarvis should have been accompanied on this trip by the one person able to positively identify Barton. However, Edward Plant appears to have been co-opted by the Pinkertons, who also had no idea what Barton looked like.”
In respect of the second part of latter sentence, I'm intrigued as to why you have kept something in your book which is so blatantly untrue.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Deconstructing Jack by Simon Wood
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Steve,
The newly-indexed book contains a further 95 pages on subjects such as Kelly's funeral, the Jarvis libel case, Edward Stanley, the Mitre Square murder, events at Millers Court, the Chapman murder, a closer look at a couple of Ripperology's sacred texts [Anderson and Swanson] . . . and other things.
Regards,
Simon
Steve
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Steve,
The newly-indexed book contains a further 95 pages on subjects such as Kelly's funeral, the Jarvis libel case, Edward Stanley, the Mitre Square murder, events at Millers Court, the Chapman murder, a closer look at a couple of Ripperology's sacred texts [Anderson and Swanson] . . . and other things.
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi All,
A new expanded edition of Deconstructing Jack: The Secret History of the Whitechapel Murders will be available in the next few days.
[ATTACH]18085[/ATTACH]
Regards,
Simon
From a friend, and admirer, thanks Simon for your contributions.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi All,
A new expanded edition of Deconstructing Jack: The Secret History of the Whitechapel Murders will be available in the next few days.
[ATTACH]18085[/ATTACH]
Regards,
Simon
Can one ask what new areas or topics this covers.
I ask because there as been a recent tendency to reissue books with little or no added material. So best to know before we buy. (Not by you).
SteveLast edited by Elamarna; 06-14-2017, 11:13 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Hi Robert,
It's enough to make you cross-eyed.
I just tallied up the passengers on that page. The total is 45. I make it 17 women and 27 men. Total 44.
So you're right. The missing passenger must be a man.
Well spotted.
Regards,
Simon
Leave a comment:
-
You might have something there, Simon. But on the other hand, if you look at the totals at the foot of the page, they seem to mean 45 passengers, with 17 females and 28 males. The 28th male must come from the torn portion. If the missing passenger was a woman, then you'd expect to see 27 males and 18 females.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Yes the age thing is a problem. Too much to believe that he was the same age as Carter and got a ditto there too.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment: