New Book On Cross
Collapse
X
-
New Book On Cross
Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”Tags: None
-
I’ll stick with Geddy’sRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
-
-
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
Which if I'm being totally honest is absolutely terrible. It's only 60 odd pages long and mentions the name 'Christer Holmgren' more than it does Charles Cross/Lechmere. It even has it's own Christer Holmgren chapter... I actually think because of the 'flowery' language used it's actually an A.I. generated affair...
Comment
-
Originally posted by barnflatwyngarde View Post
I don't know Geddy's real name.
Do you have a link for his book?
The Year is 1888. Ask a good number of people if they know of any historical events that took place that year. Do they mention the Lawn Tennis Association being founded; do they mention Carl Benz being issued with the World’s first ‘permit’ driving licence. Does anyone mention the first six games of the newlyRegards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
-
Spoiler alert!
Cross didn’t do it.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
-
Well done Geddy2112. However it is a sad state of affairs when someone has had to write a book about a witness that for some unfathomable reason has been turned into a suspect by some buffoons. I wish Ripperologists would concentrate on people who may actually have been the Ripper rather than the sort of rubbish suspects such as Cross.
Comment
-
A review of Norman's book from the opening post...
'His job involved being abroad at night, allowing him to move around without suspicion. And the kicker is, he found one of the bodies. And that’s where it gets interesting, because piecing together and reviewing witnesses’ statements at the time, it seems likely the victim was still alive when Lechmere ‘discovered’ her. It’s entirely plausible that may have pretended to find her to cover his tracks. Added to that he gave a false name…and the circumstantial evidence starts to build a strong case.'
If the book is pushing that I think I might have to give it a swerve...
Comment
-
If someone is trying to make a case for Cross then lying is the most vital ingredient. Without lies you have nothing.Regards
Sir Herlock Sholmes.
“A house of delusions is cheap to build but draughty to live in.”
Comment
Comment