VINCENT THE RIPPER: Vincent Van Gogh Was Jack The Ripper, Case Closed, V1

[Vincent alias Jack]

[QUOTE=Trevor Marriott;n849318]

What you have provided is a sketch The original photo looks like x`s

If I am perfectly honest I would say that the facial wounds were caused by the killer when Eddowes was fighting for her life with the killer behind her and was trying to cut her throat. Would he have had the time to do all he allegedly did?

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

It's a police sketch. The photo of Eddowes was taken after her autopsy and they stitched her up. So, things look much different.

I believe he strangled her first, like with his other Ripper victims, and timing his acts to the police beat, he then had plenty of time to make all the cuts and all he did, including cutting his initials into her face.

[Herlock Sholmes]

Traveled to London
Based on Vincent’s own words and letters and the Jack the Ripper letters matching up in timing and contents.

What ‘words’? You’re just making things up.

Money
Correct, Vincent relied on his brother Theo for all of his finances. But your lack of detailed research is showing. It’s not expected from you, though. You choose rather to make unwarranted attacks from a position of ignorance about what you speak. Vincent and Theo wrote back and forth regularly, and Vincent thanked Theo for the money he received. This provides the amount of money he was receiving, while also providing he had the money to travel each time. Even more so, their Uncle Cent died July 28, 1888, and part of his inheritance went to Theo. Vincent knew he could push Theo to get some of it, which he did relentlessly. Theo obliged and sent much more, and this provided Vincent the means to travel at just the right time to begin and continue the Ripper murders. In fact, it provided the starting point for the first murder, Tabram, on August 7.

More inventions. Prove that he travelled (ie evidence of him saying “I’m off to London.” Or a ships manifest with Vincent Van Gogh on it. Have you found evidence of this journey? Let me guess. No. Have you found any evidence that he ever received any more than just enough money to exist on. Let me guess. No.

Nobody said he was violent or had a dangerous attitude towards women:
Ha! You lack so much knowledge on the subject it’s embarrassing, which wouldn’t matter if you weren’t acting as if you know it all. Vincent attempted to attack Paul Gauguin with a razor before cutting off his own ear. He took a gun and went to the art instructor Cormon’s house to shoot him but he wasn’t home. And goodness, he was arrested because several women in Arles complained he was touching them in public.

So ‘no’. He wasn’t violent or had any dangerous attitudes to women. Zero.

You have no clue about the details of Vincent’s life, and your continued attacks, just as in the past, are baseless and rude. Believing it is your duty to trash someone else’s work based on what you think you know and not on what the facts are doesn’t match what a person who views themselves as investigating murders should be up to. If you can’t comment in a cordial manner and are going to continue your baseless attacks, why not move on to other things.

Because you are bringing the subject into complete disrepute (both art and ripper studies) This isn’t a genuine, thought out, researched theory. It’s a man thinking “ how can I make some money.” I could put together a case for virtually anyone alive at the time of the murders. What you have done is simple. It’s a con job and you know it. How many lane theories have come about by drivel like word puzzles and hidden images. Everyone of them nonsense.

Find one single person, just one, with a real knowledge of the case who agrees with you.

Find one single person, just one, who is an expert on Van Gogh who agrees with you.

I don’t care how cordial you pretend to be. You were cordial years ago. Anyone can pretend to be genuine.

Vincent Van Gogh is without the minutest doubt the most embarrassing suspect ever named. An utter disgrace.

[Abby Normal]

Because you are bringing the subject into complete disrepute (both art and ripper studies) This isn’t a genuine, thought out, researched theory. It’s a man thinking “ how can I make some money.” I could put together a case for virtually anyone alive at the time of the murders. What you have done is simple. It’s a con job and you know it. How many lane theories have come about by drivel like word puzzles and hidden images. Everyone of them nonsense.

Find one single person, just one, with a real knowledge of the case who agrees with you.

Find one single person, just one, who is an expert on Van Gogh who agrees with you.

I don’t care how cordial you pretend to be. You were cordial years ago. Anyone can pretend to be genuine.

Vincent Van Gogh is without the minutest doubt the most embarrassing suspect ever named. An utter disgrace.

cmon herlock, it explains all the witness sightings of a red/ sandy haired man. you know like blotchy and the odd man mrs fiddymont saw etc. lol

[Lombro2]

Since serial killers are artists, Hitler was an artist, Stalin was an artist, what exactly is being brought into disrepute--something that has no repute in the first place or something which has too much repute.

Maybe this book will being repute!

Bloody bloody night
Paint your pallet bloody red
Look out on an autumn night
With eyes that see the darkness of my soul

I am not a Pole

[Tom_Wescott]

Hi Dale. Isn't this the book announced originally a decade or more ago but never came out?

Yours truly,

Tom Wescott

[barnflatwyngarde]

Van Gogh and Gaugin lived together in Arles, France from 23rd October, 1888 to 25th December, 1888.

[Herlock Sholmes]

cmon herlock, it explains all the witness sightings of a red/ sandy haired man. you know like blotchy and the odd man mrs fiddymont saw etc. lol

Game over then Abby

[Herlock Sholmes]

Van Gogh and Gaugin lived together in Arles, France from 23rd October, 1888 to 25th December, 1888.

Van Gogh appeared on an episode of Dr. Who so maybe he gave Vincent a lift in his TARDIS.

[barnflatwyngarde]

August 1888 was a hugely productive one for Vincent.

He painted 23 works in that month, this would surely be problematic if he was making jaunts to Whitechapel during that month.

[The Baron]

The e-book version of VINCENT THE RIPPER Volume 1 is planned for March 2025. The original book has been split into 3 volumes. I'll post the specific publish date once it's close.

Sincerely,
Dale Larner

VincentTheRipper.com

This sounds absolutely fascinating! The connection between Van Gogh and Jack the Ripper is certainly an intriguing and unexpected angle. Exploring the psychological and historical links between the two could shed new light on both figures, and this one is definitely unique. Looking forward to seeing how the pieces come together in your book. Wishing you success with the release. I'll be eagerly waiting to read it!



The Baron

[Herlock Sholmes]

[The Baron]

Traveled to London
Based on Vincent’s own words and letters and the Jack the Ripper letters matching up in timing and contents.

Money
Correct, Vincent relied on his brother Theo for all of his finances. But your lack of detailed research is showing. It’s not expected from you, though. You choose rather to make unwarranted attacks from a position of ignorance about what you speak. Vincent and Theo wrote back and forth regularly, and Vincent thanked Theo for the money he received. This provides the amount of money he was receiving, while also providing he had the money to travel each time. Even more so, their Uncle Cent died July 28, 1888, and part of his inheritance went to Theo. Vincent knew he could push Theo to get some of it, which he did relentlessly. Theo obliged and sent much more, and this provided Vincent the means to travel at just the right time to begin and continue the Ripper murders. In fact, it provided the starting point for the first murder, Tabram, on August 7.

Nobody said he was violent or had a dangerous attitude towards women:
Ha! You lack so much knowledge on the subject it’s embarrassing, which wouldn’t matter if you weren’t acting as if you know it all. Vincent attempted to attack Paul Gauguin with a razor before cutting off his own ear. He took a gun and went to the art instructor Cormon’s house to shoot him but he wasn’t home. And goodness, he was arrested because several women in Arles complained he was touching them in public.

You have no clue about the details of Vincent’s life, and your continued attacks, just as in the past, are baseless and rude. Believing it is your duty to trash someone else’s work based on what you think you know and not on what the facts are doesn’t match what a person who views themselves as investigating murders should be up to. If you can’t comment in a cordial manner and are going to continue your baseless attacks, why not move on to other things.

These are some compelling points, backed by solid references to Vincent’s own life and letters. The financial aspect is often overlooked, but the inheritance timeline adds a fascinating layer.

His documented violent tendencies also challenge the common perception of him. It’s clear that there’s more to explore here, and dismissing it without proper consideration would be a mistake.

Looking forward to seeing this theory unfold further!



The Baron

[John Wheat]

Another frankly ridiculous thread.

[The Baron]

Another frankly ridiculous thread.

Ah yes, another groundbreaking contribution to Ripperology: calling something ‘ridiculous’ and then running away. No counterpoints, no argument, just pure, empty dismissal. It’s almost impressive how little effort went into this response. If this is the level of debate you bring, no wonder you're stuck clinging to Bury like a security blanket. At least try to pretend you have something meaningful to add.



The Baron

[Lewis C]

Thank you, can it be proven Vinny was in London during the times of the crimes? I heard he was not and in France. Are you hoping to suggest he murdered the C5 or more? Thanks.

Van Gogh was in Arles, which is southern France, in 1888.