Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Best suspect book?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best suspect book?

    Hi all,

    What does everyone think is the best JTR suspect book? A book that is careful and sticks to the facts and presents it's case through non-fantastical means and has a credible author.

    In my opinion, I've always thought Robert House's book on Kosminski was the best one, mostly because (aside from the reasons I listed above), he doesn't say that he was JTR, but why he was considered the #1 sus pect at the time.
    I won't make any deals. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed,de-briefed, or numbered!

  • #2
    Definitely Helena's recent work about George Chapman, "Jack the Ripper at last?"

    I haven't actually read Tim Riordan's "Prince of Quacks" about Tumblety but I would think that's up there somewhere going by the reviews and comments about it

    Comment


    • #3
      Thank you Nemo.
      I won't make any deals. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed,de-briefed, or numbered!

      Comment


      • #4
        George Chapman

        Until recently it would have been Rob House on Kosminski, but now it'd have to be Helena...

        All the best

        Dave

        Comment


        • #5
          Does Helena's book qualify as a 'suspect' book since, from what I've heard, she argues against Chapman as a Ripper suspect and not for him?

          Yours truly,

          Tom Wescott

          Comment


          • #6
            I'd say so Tom

            Chapman has been considered a suspect and if you are interested in him as such then Id recommend Helena's book which may change your opinions somewhat

            PS
            I just noticed there's something wrong with the times on current posts - yours shows as 11.30am and at the bottom of the page it says it is 12.30pm GMT whereas it's approx 7.20pm - strange

            Comment


            • #7
              Rob House's book on Prime Suspect Kosminski so far, as it is backed by facts and leaves it to us to decide....

              Pat.....................

              Comment


              • #8
                I have trouble thinking of Helena's book as a 'suspect' book or even a Ripper book, but to each his own. And I don't think that answer was in keeping with the spirit in which JTRSickert asked his question.

                Although in dire need of an update, I'd put 'The Lodger' by Evans & Gainey up at the top of the list along with Rob House's book. However, I can't agree that House's book was in any way unbiased, though it would be stupid to expect it to be.

                There's actually a number of suspect books I've enjoyed even though I was not convinced by the conclusions. The Diary books come to mind, as well as Euan McPherson's book on Bury. Ripper Legacy was a lot of fun. And Cornwell. A well-written suspect book is often easier to read for me at this stage than yet another dry run of 'the facts'.

                Yours truly,

                Tom Wescott

                Comment


                • #9
                  Clearly it is VINCENT ALIAS JACK.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
                    There's actually a number of suspect books I've enjoyed even though I was not convinced by the conclusions. The Diary books come to mind, as well as Euan McPherson's book on Bury. Ripper Legacy was a lot of fun. And Cornwell. A well-written suspect book is often easier to read for me at this stage than yet another dry run of 'the facts'.

                    Yours truly,

                    Tom Wescott
                    Hi Tom,

                    What is your opinion of Tully's book on James Kelly? I find Kelly to be a very interesting person of interest, despite the lack of evidence.

                    Barnaby

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
                      I have trouble thinking of Helena's book as a 'suspect' book or even a Ripper book, but to each his own.
                      Many thanks to Dave and Paul for "voting" my book as the best.

                      Tom's comment puzzles me. I present a suspect's back-story, then list the reasons people have given to suspect he was the Ripper, then analyse those reasons. Sounds like a perfect blueprint for a Ripper suspect book to me.

                      Where is it written that a book about a JtR suspect HAS always to be trying to force people to believe that the person was the Ripper? It's THAT kind of attitude that makes people suppress any evidence to the contrary, and overblow, or - worse still - to invent a pack of lies to back up their arguments.


                      Helena
                      Helena Wojtczak BSc (Hons) FRHistS.

                      Author of 'Jack the Ripper at Last? George Chapman, the Southwark Poisoner'. Click this link : - http://www.hastingspress.co.uk/chapman.html

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by HelenaWojtczak View Post
                        Tom's comment puzzles me. I present a suspect's back-story, then list the reasons people have given to suspect he was the Ripper, then analyse those reasons. Sounds like a perfect blueprint for a Ripper suspect book to me.
                        It's far too good a biography for that, Helena. Besides, it seems to me that most "Ripper suspect books" have, as their raison d'être, a hell-bent desire to "sell" their suspect to the reading public. That's how I'd characterise a "Ripper suspect book" anyway.

                        Whilst you've produced a book about a Ripper suspect, it offers a whole lot more. If it must be classified as a "Ripper suspect" book then, like only a few others (Tully's included, I'd say), it stands out from the crowd.
                        Kind regards, Sam Flynn

                        "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Tully's book was unputdownable for me. He does stretch things a bit, and I so wish he could have published Kelly's confession/journal so we could have read for ourselves about his misadventures upon leaving England, but the character of Kelly himself plus the inability to dismiss him, makes him viable, and perhaps all thanks is due to Tully. Long sentence there.

                          Mike
                          huh?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by HelenaWojtczak View Post
                            Many thanks to Dave and Paul for "voting" my book as the best.

                            Tom's comment puzzles me. I present a suspect's back-story, then list the reasons people have given to suspect he was the Ripper, then analyse those reasons. Sounds like a perfect blueprint for a Ripper suspect book to me.

                            Where is it written that a book about a JtR suspect HAS always to be trying to force people to believe that the person was the Ripper? It's THAT kind of attitude that makes people suppress any evidence to the contrary, and overblow, or - worse still - to invent a pack of lies to back up their arguments.


                            Helena
                            Hi Helena. I've never considered Chapman much of a Ripper suspect. And what I was saying was more along the lines of what Sam Flynn said after me. JTRSickert was asking about suspect books that argued FOR a suspect...yours doesn't, so I thought that should be pointed out.

                            Yours truly,

                            Tom Wescott

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Barnaby View Post
                              Hi Tom,

                              What is your opinion of Tully's book on James Kelly? I find Kelly to be a very interesting person of interest, despite the lack of evidence.

                              Barnaby
                              Good book about a very unlikely suspect. A bit outdated now, but a very solid factual effort for its time, considering the resources available to authors then.

                              Yours truly,

                              Tom Wescott

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X