Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jack the Ripper: CSI Whitechapel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jenni Shelden
    replied
    I have to say, this book is gorgeous!!!! It is brilliance in book formation.
    I love, love, love the illustrations, the text is magnificent too. We are still drooling over our copy

    that is all

    Jenni

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    It's not something I generally do, but I'm shamelessly "bumping" this thread, because the book it describes is SO good...the quality of the illustrations alone make it worth the money...

    It has to be the best general introduction to the case, ever...

    Thanks Paul/John

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • PhiltheBear
    replied
    Originally posted by Supe View Post
    John,

    Sorry folks, these aren't reviews of the book.

    Is it possible for you to ask them to remove the inappropriate reviews?

    Don.
    Yes, you can email them and they will remove reviews that are in any way wrong (as opposed to being a different viewpoint). I complained about 'puff' reviews on a book that appeared before it had been published - and they took them down.

    Leave a comment:


  • Supe
    replied
    John,

    Sorry folks, these aren't reviews of the book.

    Is it possible for you to ask them to remove the inappropriate reviews?

    Don.

    Leave a comment:


  • mariab
    replied
    Wow, nice trick by amazon. To confuse Ripperology's editorial body.

    “Rather than being another attempt to identify the culprit, this book examines the facts behind one of the most infamous and grisly episodes of the Victorian era.“ should have given it away anyway.
    'Course amazon got it wrong, as, even without the book being a self-declared "another attempt to identify the culprit", the careful reader might detect a tendency towards considering Kozminsky as a viable suspect.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Bennett
    replied
    Sorry folks, these aren't reviews of the book. Rather naughtily, Amazon have put up a few reviews of Paul's 'The Facts', and they were there before this book even came out.

    JB

    Leave a comment:


  • Supe
    replied
    Tom,

    A Ripper Notes review in 2012? Does that mean Norder is back? Say it ain't so.

    Don.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Below is the publisher's blurb from Amazon.com. It lists a few review excerpts. How can I get a copy of the Ripper Notes issue that reviewed this book?

    Reviews of the hardback edition:

    'Such an extensive and entertaining book has long been needed, and we are fortunate that Paul Begg has chosen to write it' "Ripper Notes"

    'As good a general account of Jack the Ripper as exists' "The Sunday Telegraph"

    'Rather than being another attempt to identify the culprit, this book examines the facts behind one of the most infamous and grisly episodes of the Victorian era.' "Best of British"

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil H
    replied
    My copy of the book was waiting for me when I returned from a weekend away. I opened the amazon package not knowing what I would find. I had ordered the book solely on the reputation of the two authors.

    Yesterday I perused it for the first time and I know it is a book I will go back to time and again. It immediately gained a place on the shelf where i keep my reliable Ripper references.

    Why?

    Well, as Cogidubnus has said it is a good general introduction to the subject. I saw no immediate glaring errors (though I have not read it in detail yet) and it seems to follow no specific "theory". Thus it should be a useful quick resource for checking basic facts.

    But, for me at least, it is the recreation of the Whitechapel of autumn 1888 that is most helpful and a brilliant addition to our visual knowledge. The (I assume) computer renditions of the murder sites are superb. The texturing at first glance looks "off", but one gets used to that. What is impressive is the painstaking recreation of each site, the lighting, the appearance, the atmosphere. We can now visualise brilliantly the dimness of the lighting - compnsating for many of the old but "taken in daylight" pictures to which we are used. I was slightly disappointed that there was no recreation of the interior of 13 Miller's Court.

    The book has been exquisitely put together too - it is nice to hold, lovely to look at, and CRAMMED with information. The maps are excellent, clear and helpful - I can for the first time begin to understand the assault on Emma Smith, for instance. We have precise placings of all the lodging houses, especially in Dorset St, but also elsewhere - that corrected some mental misconceptions for me.

    All in all a most valuable addition to the Ripper library and one that i would recommend highly to anyone.

    Congratulations to the authors on a job excellently done.

    Phil H

    Leave a comment:


  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    Stunned

    I think this book is possibly the best general introduction to the Whitechapel Murders so far produced...it is difficult to envisage anything better...One could only describe the level of illustration using the cliched terms "lavish" and "atmospheric" but I don't think even those words do the work justice...

    There's nothing startlingly new here, except the sheer quality of the production...I'm stunned...I know the word is probably wrong, bearing in mind the subject matter, but it's a beautiful book...

    Congratulations Paul/John...I reckon you've crafted a winner!

    All the best

    Dave
    Last edited by Cogidubnus; 10-16-2012, 12:39 AM. Reason: spelling!

    Leave a comment:


  • Jdombrowski89
    replied
    I fail to see the importance in nitpicking on the cover, let alone the specifics of it. Coming from two of the best authors in Ripperology today, you'd think some people would be satisfied with the quality, not quantity. Unfortunately, as Paul has stated, things such as these deal with the marketing aspect of the business.

    Just as with Filmmaking and writing anything, it's become, in this society and day and age, a marketing industry in terms of books, movies, and music. What is the public used to when they think of Jack the Ripper? A man carrying a gladstone bag, with a top hat and a black cape around London Fog. It's whats captivated many, and even some of us, to perhaps look into the real story and the murders themselves. So from a Marketing standpoint -- I can see why the publisher chose the cover. Although the look is mostly innaccurate from what we know, that image and the visual(s) it presents is what's going to get people interested, especially the term 'CSI' and 'Jack the Ripper'. Marketing genius.

    We've got better things to argue about.

    Congrats, Paul and John. Looking forward to purchasing this gem.

    JD

    Leave a comment:


  • Phil H
    replied
    I ordered my copy from Amazon today. Hopefully it will arrive in time for me to take it on a trip to Scotland this weekend and read it on a long train journey.

    Phil H

    Leave a comment:


  • JDow
    replied
    Originally posted by PhiltheBear View Post
    If you are going to pick holes in the cover, don't forget that Jack looks about 20 ft tall.....

    The cover is irrelevant - this looks like being a great addition to the arsenal of JtR literature. Do let us know when there's an exact publication date.
    <sidles in beside pigeons; unleashes moggy>

    Maybrick wore a top hat.

    <exits, stage left, pursued by pitchfork wielding locals shouting 'Leather Apron!'>

    Leave a comment:


  • Albert
    replied
    John
    Thanks for this releasing this book - it will be a classic, I'm sure. Everything about it is excellent, from the layout to the artwork and from the text to the photographs. Brilliant.
    Albert

    Leave a comment:


  • John Bennett
    replied
    Ulp! I'm still waiting for mine!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X