Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jack the Ripper A-Z

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lynn cates
    replied
    Buddha

    Hello Tom. They seem to be picking up on the Buddha's ontology in that he claimed there was no self (ie, ego).

    I had a student once who claimed that the problem of self-identity was best solved through the Buddha's position that there is no self. It was a fairly well written paper and he would have gotten top mark, but, as I pointed out to him, I had difficulty assigning the mark since he had no self. As I recall, the lad changed his mind.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Stewart P Evans
    replied
    Don't Worry

    Don't worry lads - you'll get over it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rob Clack
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    They wouldnt do that.

    Monty
    I would.

    Originally posted by Chris View Post
    Incidentally, the text is searchable on Amazon's website, which makes it easy to see that there are 11 occurrences of "Robert Clack," 5 of "Philip Hutchinson" and 4 of "Robert Linford."
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1844...ref=sib_dp_ptu
    Thanks Chris, something to casually mention to Philip

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    I have friends. Begg, Fido and Skinner must like me to mention me 8 TIMES their book, so NYUUUUUUUUHHHH!.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    P.S. I don't get the Buddha/misheard joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Grave Maurice
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    I'm ego free
    Isn't that Spanish for "friendless"?

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris View Post
    I think you must have misheard that.
    Nice one, Chris

    The batteries in my hearing aid aren't too clever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Stephen Thomas View Post
    My, my, Tom. You're a veritable Buddha aren't you?
    I think you must have misheard that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stephen Thomas
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    I'm ego free and personally don't care how many times I'm mentioned.
    My, my, Tom. You're a veritable Buddha aren't you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Westcott knows his stuff, but I'm not sure about this guy Wescott.....probably trying to bask in Westcott's glory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Westcott = Grrrrrr!

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris
    replied
    Originally posted by Tom_Wescott View Post
    Now if someone could please run that free word search on 'Wescott' and post the count here, that'd be great.
    Seven mentions as Wescott, and one as Westcott.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    I'm ego free and personally don't care how many times I'm mentioned. Now if someone could please run that free word search on 'Wescott' and post the count here, that'd be great. Not for me, of course, because I have no ego and couldn't care less...but my legion of fans might be interested.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    I can't abide huge egos.

    By the way, if they only mention me 4 times then it's a rotten book and I hope no one buys it ever, ever, ever.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Oh yeah, cuz Rob and Philip don't have huge ******* egos.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Robert View Post
    Doubtless Rob Clack and Philip Hutchinson are going through it with a fine toothed comb to see which of them got more mentions.
    They wouldnt do that.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X