Hi Everyone;
The Ripper and the Royals, for me, is the worst book I've ever read. I don't know if it's because that Melvyn Fairclough is still credulous enough to believe anything Joseph Gorman says or the feeling that the author is somehow making it up as he goes along or the 'evidence', like the Abberline Diaries, that mysteriously have gone missing or the claim that PAV lived on until 1930 in Glamis Castle. Maybe he was the Glamis monster but to be fair MF does include later photos of PAV and George Hutchinson, so that's quite convincing, yeah right!
Elizabeth
The Ripper and the Royals, for me, is the worst book I've ever read. I don't know if it's because that Melvyn Fairclough is still credulous enough to believe anything Joseph Gorman says or the feeling that the author is somehow making it up as he goes along or the 'evidence', like the Abberline Diaries, that mysteriously have gone missing or the claim that PAV lived on until 1930 in Glamis Castle. Maybe he was the Glamis monster but to be fair MF does include later photos of PAV and George Hutchinson, so that's quite convincing, yeah right!
Elizabeth
Comment