Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Patricia Cornwell - Walter Sickert - BOOK 2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by richardnunweek View Post
    Hi.
    I must disagree, if it could be proven that Sickert wrote at least one of the letters, it would point to guilt.
    Would people be so keen to dismiss , if it could be proven that Druitt, Kosminski,Kelly, Prince Albert Victor, wrote one?
    Regards Richard.
    Yep. And I think three of those you mention make good suspects, but being a letter writer does not a ripper make when we know as a fact that letters were received from 100s, if not 1000s, of different people.

    Leave a comment:


  • richardnunweek
    replied
    Hi.
    I must disagree, if it could be proven that Sickert wrote at least one of the letters, it would point to guilt.
    Would people be so keen to dismiss , if it could be proven that Druitt, Kosminski,Kelly, Prince Albert Victor, wrote one?
    Regards Richard.

    Leave a comment:


  • John Wheat
    replied
    This book belongs in the fiction section like the rest of Cornwell's stories.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by John G View Post
    I'm reminded of the notorious Wearside Jack letters and tapes during the Yorkshire Ripper enquiry. The police were convinced they were sent by the killer, apparently containing information that only the killer could know. Of course, in reality they were sent by a sad alcoholic who had nothing to do with the murders.
    Yep very similar. Unfortunately even if Walter were Jack, proving he wrote some letters won't prove it.

    There were literally 1000s of letters, clearly not all from one person, if Jack sent any (and I don't rule out that possibility) which one(s).

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    I'm reminded of the notorious Wearside Jack letters and tapes during the Yorkshire Ripper enquiry. The police were convinced they were sent by the killer, apparently containing information that only the killer could know. Of course, in reality they were sent by a sad alcoholic who had nothing to do with the murders.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    Basically the most she established was that Walter wrote some letters.

    Now if, like most, you doubt that the killer was the writer that doesn't take you very far.
    Thanks, GUT. Well, I don't think Sickert wrote ALL the letters, but he was enough of a crime buff that he may well have written some of them. Cornwell says her new book focuses on a small print run of a specific type of paper that is linked to Sickert's personal letters and some JTR letters.

    Did JTR write letters? Why not-- other serial killers have, though they mostly came after him.

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    Interesting article, although there are some spelling errors in it. Thanks for the link.

    I have not read either book yet. Can anyone tell me why Cornwell's theory is so universally mocked by Ripperologists?
    Basically the most she established was that Walter wrote some letters.

    Now if, like most, you doubt that the killer was the writer that doesn't take you very far.

    Leave a comment:


  • John G
    replied
    Originally posted by Pcdunn View Post
    Interesting article, although there are some spelling errors in it. Thanks for the link.

    I have not read either book yet. Can anyone tell me why Cornwell's theory is so universally mocked by Ripperologists?
    It's a long time since I saw the TV programme, but basically her case is reliant on Sickert being responsible for the Ripper letters. However, most researchers, of course, consider most of the Ripper letters to be hoaxes. She also claims the letters contain information that only the killer would know but doesn't elaborate.

    There was also a scientific test on one of the letters, in which I believe saliva from a stamp was linked to Sickert. However, this was on the basis of mitochondrial DNA, which several million Britains at the time would have shared, so therefore not even as strong as Russell Edwards' DNA evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • drstrange169
    replied
    It's amazing how many times the Daily Mail has discovered who Jtr was in recent years.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pcdunn
    replied
    Interesting article, although there are some spelling errors in it. Thanks for the link.

    I have not read either book yet. Can anyone tell me why Cornwell's theory is so universally mocked by Ripperologists?

    Leave a comment:


  • richardh
    started a topic Patricia Cornwell - Walter Sickert - BOOK 2

    Patricia Cornwell - Walter Sickert - BOOK 2

    "Her original accusations in her 2002 book, Portrait of a Killer: Jack the Ripper - Case Closed, outraged art historians and were dismissed by Ripperologists as 'improbable'.
    But now, in a new book to be released next week, Cornwell claims the proof of Sickert's guilt lies in the paper he used."

    More HERE

    Crime writer Patricia Cornwell, left, claims she has vital evidence to prove the identity of Britain's biggest serial killer, Jack the Ripper. She believes the renowned artist Walter Sickert is the culprit
Working...
X