Greetings all,
I've been a reader of Casebook: Jack the Ripper for some time, but I've never posted before now.
Last night on the Science Channel I watched an hour long documentary on Jack. The guide listings showed the title as Jack The Ripper: New Evidence, but the show's title was Jack The Ripper: Killer Revealed. The guide listings dated the show as 2009.
In any event, the show centered on a historian named Mei Trow who put forth his theory that the mortuary attendant Robert Mann was Jack. I watched the whole show and it seemed that there was no evidence to support this. It seemed to me that the only reason that Trow fingered Mann as Jack was that he fit an FBI profile done regarding Jack. I thought this was pretty sketchy.
Aside from the sketchiness of naming someone without any evidence whatsoever, the documentary did do a nice job of showing what the sites look like in today's London.
I was wondering if anyone else has seen this show and what they thought of it.
Thanks,
Greg
I've been a reader of Casebook: Jack the Ripper for some time, but I've never posted before now.
Last night on the Science Channel I watched an hour long documentary on Jack. The guide listings showed the title as Jack The Ripper: New Evidence, but the show's title was Jack The Ripper: Killer Revealed. The guide listings dated the show as 2009.
In any event, the show centered on a historian named Mei Trow who put forth his theory that the mortuary attendant Robert Mann was Jack. I watched the whole show and it seemed that there was no evidence to support this. It seemed to me that the only reason that Trow fingered Mann as Jack was that he fit an FBI profile done regarding Jack. I thought this was pretty sketchy.
Aside from the sketchiness of naming someone without any evidence whatsoever, the documentary did do a nice job of showing what the sites look like in today's London.
I was wondering if anyone else has seen this show and what they thought of it.
Thanks,
Greg
Comment