Have just finished watching a programme on JtR, "Mystery Quest" I think was its title on History Channel.
Both Stewart Evans and Don Rumbelow gave expert accounts of the historical background to the case, as one would expect , and showed due reservation when it came to expressing any certainty about who the killer might have been . I thought the presenter, while well able to grab the attention of the viewer, was actually a bit glib about reckoning Tumblety to be the killer .His use of just one handwriting expert to determine that Tumblety had written the Lusk letter wasa bit over the top.His other points made sense although there is still doubt about whether his assertion that Tumblety owned a collection of organs,let alone that they were classified according to social class,came as a bit of a surprise since this has not yet be proven to be a historical fact.
Norma
Both Stewart Evans and Don Rumbelow gave expert accounts of the historical background to the case, as one would expect , and showed due reservation when it came to expressing any certainty about who the killer might have been . I thought the presenter, while well able to grab the attention of the viewer, was actually a bit glib about reckoning Tumblety to be the killer .His use of just one handwriting expert to determine that Tumblety had written the Lusk letter wasa bit over the top.His other points made sense although there is still doubt about whether his assertion that Tumblety owned a collection of organs,let alone that they were classified according to social class,came as a bit of a surprise since this has not yet be proven to be a historical fact.
Norma
Comment