Bios of Maria Harvey & Joe Barnett after 1888?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • miss marple
    replied
    Very interesting research by Chris on Maria Harvey, but as usual with ripper stuff it raises more questions than it answers,
    If it is the right Maria Harvey, at the time of the murder of MK she appears to be a respectable married woman, mother of five children, youngest about 15 months.[ born either Shoreditch June 87 or Hackney march 88] based around Hoxton Hackney

    Mary's friend is described as young, although calling herself a launderess, she was prob also a part time prostitute. She stayed a few nights at Millers Court before getting her own place at 3 New Place. This Maria does not appear to be married. In 88 Charles Harvey was still alive and their is no reason to suppose that his wife had moved to Spitalfields and abandoned her children.
    BUT if it is the same one, perhaps she had a drink problem and temporarily left her family from time to time. This is pure speculation

    Borough Police Court 1874
    Maria Harvey charged with being very drunk and notorious on Saturday night was fined 10s and costs or 14 days.[ the usual fine was 5s so she was totally tanked]
    She would have been about 25. It it most likely not her, but interesting.
    Charles death cert would be good reading to see what he died of and whether his wife was the informant.

    Miss Marple

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris Scott View Post
    With regard to Maria Harvey, I thought I had lost these notes!



    Westmoreland Place is now named Westland Place and runs north off the City Road north-west of Old Street. At the northern end, Westland Place runs into Nile Street, one time street of residence of Henrietta, Joseph Fleming's mother.

    The oldest child listed was 23 in 1891 so would have been born about 1868, so assuming all were legitimate, the marriage should be probably not long before this. In fact Maria married in 1865.
    Church of St Philip, Clerkenwell
    Date: 25 December 1865
    Groom:
    Name: Charles Harvey
    Age: 23
    Condition: Bachelor
    Profession: Carver
    Residence: 17 Green Terrace
    Father's name: Joseph Harvey
    Father's trade: Printer
    Bride:
    Name: Maria Scott
    Age: 19
    Condition: Spinster
    Residence: 7 City Gardens
    Father's name: William Scott
    Father's trade: Watch finisher
    Witnesses:
    William Scott
    Emma Thomas
    Any chance of locating Emma Thomas or knowing who she might have been?

    Leave a comment:


  • Gene Lewis
    replied
    Thank's everybody for these informations... I opened a new thread before having read these... (about post nov 1888 Maria Harvey)...
    Apologize...

    Regards
    Gene

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris Scott View Post
    I think you mean the one where he is listed as suffering from gout which I read about in the thread you gave the link for. If that is the case, I think it highly likely this could be the Joseph Barnet(t) listed as living with Louisa. My personal opinion is that we still have to find Barnett in both the 1891 and 1901 census returns.
    regards
    Chris
    Yes, Chris, I do mean him this time, glad to know that Sally was correct this time!

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Scott
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    But if you check my later post, I ask about the Joseph barnett b c 1859 Sally found in Raine St (where Louisa was)in 1899 (slap bang in the middle of the mising years!)..
    I think you mean the one where he is listed as suffering from gout which I read about in the thread you gave the link for. If that is the case, I think it highly likely this could be the Joseph Barnet(t) listed as living with Louisa. My personal opinion is that we still have to find Barnett in both the 1891 and 1901 census returns.
    regards
    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Sally View Post
    Thanks Debra I don't think I'm important enough to get on the research radar though.

    There are entries for a Louisa and a Joseph Barnett in the Raine Street Infirmary records from 1898. I think I put the details on the 1901 thread from memory.

    As for the 1901 census entry - I agree that it looks unlikely at first glance - in fact I passed it over entirely before I realised just how close Old Gravel Lane was to other documented addresses for Joseph Barnett. Since I noticed that (bit slow..) I think in all probability they are one and the same.

    There is no obvious sign of Joseph and Emily Barnet in the record apart from on that occasion; and a missing Joseph and Louisa Barnett from the 1901 Census. If, as seems likely, the Joseph and Louisa Barnett in the infrimary records are the people attested in the 1911 census; then they lived in the immediate vicinity from at least 1898.

    So where are they in the 1901 Census?

    That's my reasoning. Others may disagree - and that's fine - but I'm happy with it.
    I'm following, Sally.Don't worry!

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Originally posted by Chris Scott View Post
    Hi Debs
    If you look at post #12 in this thread I do acknowledge the work that Sally did last year and included a link to the thread where her research was posted.
    Chris
    But if you check my later post, I ask about the Joseph barnett b c 1859 Sally found in Raine St (where Louisa was)in 1899 (slap bang in the middle of the mising years!)..

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Originally posted by Debra A View Post
    Awesome original research by Sally too!
    Just flying the flag for us females who's posts aren't even read or even considered now? *cough* ..the 1899 Joseph Barnett in Raine St mentioned by Sally?
    Thanks Debra I don't think I'm important enough to get on the research radar though.

    There are entries for a Louisa and a Joseph Barnett in the Raine Street Infirmary records from 1898. I think I put the details on the 1901 thread from memory.

    As for the 1901 census entry - I agree that it looks unlikely at first glance - in fact I passed it over entirely before I realised just how close Old Gravel Lane was to other documented addresses for Joseph Barnett. Since I noticed that (bit slow..) I think in all probability they are one and the same.

    There is no obvious sign of Joseph and Emily Barnet in the record apart from on that occasion; and a missing Joseph and Louisa Barnett from the 1901 Census. If, as seems likely, the Joseph and Louisa Barnett in the infrimary records are the people attested in the 1911 census; then they lived in the immediate vicinity from at least 1898.

    So where are they in the 1901 Census?

    That's my reasoning. Others may disagree - and that's fine - but I'm happy with it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Scott
    replied
    Hi Debs
    If you look at post #12 in this thread I do acknowledge the work that Sally did last year and included a link to the thread where her research was posted.
    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Debra A
    replied
    Awesome original research by Sally too!
    Just flying the flag for us females who's posts aren't even read or even considered now? *cough* ..the 1899 Joseph Barnett in Raine St mentioned by Sally?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    I stress that this is only a possible - we cannot definitely say this is Kelly's houseguest
    It's still awesome research, Chris - & very interesting. Thank-you.

    Best Wishes, Bridewell.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Scott
    replied
    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
    Hi Chris,

    I bow my head in admiration. Awesome research! I made the mistake of assuming that MJK's friend would be of or about her own age and set the parameters too narrow. Lesson learned. Just as an aside, it's interesting that she was married on Christmas Day.

    Regards, Bridewell.
    Hi Bridewell
    I stress that this is only a possible - we cannot definitely say this is Kelly's houseguest but definitely worth a look, in my opinion

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Hi Chris,

    I bow my head in admiration. Awesome research! I made the mistake of assuming that MJK's friend would be of or about her own age and set the parameters too narrow. Lesson learned. Just as an aside, it's interesting that she was married on Christmas Day.

    Regards, Bridewell.
    Last edited by Bridewell; 07-31-2012, 08:14 PM. Reason: Add last sentence

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Scott
    replied
    With regard to Maria Harvey, I thought I had lost these notes!
    Way back when, as I was doing the work for the "Cast of Thousands" project, I did some work on Maria Harvey which, as it turned out, I did not use.
    For what it's worth below are the notes on the woman I considered at the time as the best bet to be Kelly's friend. This was only ever a possible and I make no definite claim that this IS her, only that it is a possible.

    1891
    65 Westmoreland Place, Hoxton
    Head: Maria Harvey (Widow) aged 42 born Clerkenwell - Mangler (Wash)
    Children:
    Charles aged 23 born Islington - Stick dresser
    Alfred aged 21 born Bow - Stick dresser
    Caroline aged 18 born Clerkenwell - Machinist
    Florette aged 15 born Clerkenwell - Envelope folder
    Herbert aged 13 born Clerkenwell - Stick dresser's apprentice
    William aged 10 born Hoxton
    Lawrence aged 7 born Hoxton
    Edith aged 4 born Hoxton
    Brother: George Scott aged 38 born Islington - Stick dresser
    The fortuitous presence of maria's brother tells us that her maiden name would have been Maria Scott.

    Westmoreland Place is now named Westland Place and runs north off the City Road north-west of Old Street. At the northern end, Westland Place runs into Nile Street, one time street of residence of Henrietta, Joseph Fleming's mother.

    The oldest child listed was 23 in 1891 so would have been born about 1868, so assuming all were legitimate, the marriage should be probably not long before this. In fact Maria married in 1865.
    Church of St Philip, Clerkenwell
    Date: 25 December 1865
    Groom:
    Name: Charles Harvey
    Age: 23
    Condition: Bachelor
    Profession: Carver
    Residence: 17 Green Terrace
    Father's name: Joseph Harvey
    Father's trade: Printer
    Bride:
    Name: Maria Scott
    Age: 19
    Condition: Spinster
    Residence: 7 City Gardens
    Father's name: William Scott
    Father's trade: Watch finisher
    Witnesses:
    William Scott
    Emma Thomas

    Regarding the date of Maria becoming a widow, in 1891 the youngest child, Edith is listed as 4 years old, therefore born about 1887. Allowing for the term of the pregnancy, Charles Harvey could have died any time after about mid 1886. From the marriage record we know he was born in about 1842.
    The only likely record is:-
    Name: Charles Henry W Harvey
    Estimated Birth Year: abt 1843
    Date of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec 1890
    Age at Death: 47
    Registration district: Shoreditch
    Inferred County: London

    Other addresses:
    1881 census
    27 Westmoreland Place, Hoxton

    Prior to her marriage, Maria is listed as follows:-
    1851 census
    5 Brewer Street, Clerkenwell
    Head: James Aldhouse aged 76 born Ipswich - Roadsman
    Wife: Maria Aldhouse aged 68 born Ipswich
    Son in law: William Scott aged 27 born St Lukes - Watchmaker and finisher
    Daughter: Hannah Scott aged 24 born Hoxton
    Grandchildren:
    Hannah aged 6 born St Lukes
    Maria aged 4 born Clerkenwell
    William aged 1 born St Lukes

    1861 census:
    7 City Gardens, Islington
    Head: William Scott aged 37 born St Lukes - Watch finisher
    Wife: Hannah Scott aged 33 born Islington
    Children:
    Hannah aged 16 born St Lukes - Flower seller
    Maria aged 14 born Clerkenwell
    William aged 11 born St Lukes
    George aged 8 born Islington
    John aged 6 born Islington
    Eliza aged 3 born Islington

    This I believe to be Maria's death:
    Name: Maria Harvey
    Birth Date: abt 1847
    Date of Registration: Jan-Feb-Mar 1933
    Age at Death: 86
    Registration district: Shoreditch
    Inferred County: London

    Leave a comment:


  • Bridewell
    replied
    Harvey

    Originally posted by Gene Lewis View Post
    Ask for it again: what on Maria Harvey past nov' 9 ?
    Hi Gene,

    Ancestry has seven Maria Harveys listed of about the right age to be Mary's friend. One seems to have been based in Buckinghamshire throughout, but she could easily be any one of the other six, from a cursory examination at least, although none is really convincing.

    There's one who may interest Lynn Cates - married to Edward E Harvey & living at 'York Villa', Park Road, Plumstead. Her husband's occupation is listed as :
    2nd Div Clerk: "War Office".
    If this is her though, what was she doing on Dorset Street in 1888?

    Regards, Bridewell.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X