Good Afternoon, Ladies and Gentlemen...
The murder of Annie Millwood has always been a point of indecision for me- I have never been able to satisfactorily prove to myself whether she was attacked by the Ripper, or indeed attacked at all.
It seems to me as though she may have self-inflicted the wounds, perhaps due to a desire for attention, or for free medical care, if she had an idea that her health was deteriorating as it was.
Contemporary doubts were clearly expressed in the Evening Post:
We must remember that the press then, as now, liked to sensationalise- they would not insert caveats unless there was a good reason.
Why would the press not simply declare that she was murdered? There must have been either something in her history or in the way she presented herself which put doubts into the minds of those involved as to the perpetrator of her attack.
I would like to hear others' opinions as to:
1) Who inflicted the wounds upon Annie and why: Jack, another attacker, Annie for admission to the infirmary, Annie self-harming (surely a habit as common then as it seems to be now) or Annie seeking attention?
2) Could a doctor (at that time) have warned Ms Millwood of her upcoming arterial ulceration, which may have prompted her to go to desperate ends to be in an infirmary when the ulceration came about?
And finally, does an account survive (in the words of either Ms Millwood or another) of Annie's 'attack'?
Thankyou,
The Jarvo
The murder of Annie Millwood has always been a point of indecision for me- I have never been able to satisfactorily prove to myself whether she was attacked by the Ripper, or indeed attacked at all.
It seems to me as though she may have self-inflicted the wounds, perhaps due to a desire for attention, or for free medical care, if she had an idea that her health was deteriorating as it was.
Contemporary doubts were clearly expressed in the Evening Post:
[Ms Millwood] stated that she had been attacked by a man she did not know […]. No one appears to have seen the attack and as far as at present ascertained there is only the woman's statement to bear out the allegations of an attack, though that she had been stabbed cannot be denied.
Why would the press not simply declare that she was murdered? There must have been either something in her history or in the way she presented herself which put doubts into the minds of those involved as to the perpetrator of her attack.
I would like to hear others' opinions as to:
1) Who inflicted the wounds upon Annie and why: Jack, another attacker, Annie for admission to the infirmary, Annie self-harming (surely a habit as common then as it seems to be now) or Annie seeking attention?
2) Could a doctor (at that time) have warned Ms Millwood of her upcoming arterial ulceration, which may have prompted her to go to desperate ends to be in an infirmary when the ulceration came about?
And finally, does an account survive (in the words of either Ms Millwood or another) of Annie's 'attack'?
Thankyou,
The Jarvo
Comment