I am of the view that Alice MacKenzie was more likely a victim of Jack the Ripper than not. Dichotomies abound however:
1. Doctors hold opposing opinions (Bond that she was a victim but Phillips says not (though he said it in a strange way which makes me wonder if he came under pressure not to classify as a ripper victim)
2. Police officials expressed contrary views on this, but nevertheless the police presence was increased (Anderson was in the not camp but Monro thought Alice was a ripper victim).
3. A number of newspapers were heralding the return of Jack the Ripper, but of course they had commercial reasons to make the claim.
4. There were many similarities between the wounds found on Alice and those of the C5 but there were also differences (which might be explained by the use of a blunter knife).
These differences make it hard to evaluate, but I find it compelling when you undertake the thought experiment and place Alice's murder in October 1888. I am pretty sure most would then place her murder in the Canon - this is quite compelling in considering a link I think - the eight month distance in time between the C5 and Alice's murder is probably the main reason there is doubt she is a ripper victim. I don't find that a major reason to discount her.
1. Doctors hold opposing opinions (Bond that she was a victim but Phillips says not (though he said it in a strange way which makes me wonder if he came under pressure not to classify as a ripper victim)
2. Police officials expressed contrary views on this, but nevertheless the police presence was increased (Anderson was in the not camp but Monro thought Alice was a ripper victim).
3. A number of newspapers were heralding the return of Jack the Ripper, but of course they had commercial reasons to make the claim.
4. There were many similarities between the wounds found on Alice and those of the C5 but there were also differences (which might be explained by the use of a blunter knife).
These differences make it hard to evaluate, but I find it compelling when you undertake the thought experiment and place Alice's murder in October 1888. I am pretty sure most would then place her murder in the Canon - this is quite compelling in considering a link I think - the eight month distance in time between the C5 and Alice's murder is probably the main reason there is doubt she is a ripper victim. I don't find that a major reason to discount her.
Comment