Suggestion

[Pierre]

Information to David

And David is now ignored since he has only one interest as I see it and that is to destroy anything I write, thereby destroying the discussion here.

[David Orsam]

And David is now ignored since he has only one interest as I see it and that is to destroy anything I write, thereby destroying the discussion here.

That's funny, because five whole days ago you posted in this thread (#104):

"I don´t read David´s posts anymore."

If only I'd known you were reading all my posts all along!

[JadenCollins]

That's funny, because five whole days ago you posted in this thread (#104):

"I don´t read David´s posts anymore."

If only I'd known you were reading all my posts all along!

Oh come on, David, don't get caught up in his nonesense. This is exactly what he wants.

[David Orsam]

Oh come on, David, don't get caught up in his nonesense. This is exactly what he wants.

I'm not so sure. I have the proud distinction of being the only person on here that Pierre claims to be ignoring. A few of my posts have clearly discomforted him and he simply can't answer them so he pretends to ignore.

[GUT]

And David is now ignored since he has only one interest as I see it and that is to destroy anything I write, thereby destroying the discussion here.

I thought that was the whole idea to try and destroy people's ideas to see if they stood up to scrutiny, now if you're such a Prima Donna that you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen.

[JadenCollins]

I'm not so sure. I have the proud distinction of being the only person on here that Pierre claims to be ignoring. A few of my posts have clearly discomforted him and he simply can't answer them so he pretends to ignore.

Well, he clearly is reading your posts and simply pretends he doesn't and he ignores them 'cause he can't actually answer them. He can't agree on your facts and arguments or prove you wrong, 'cause he'd be showing us parts of his so called research, which I doubt. Words mean nothing, we need proof, don't we? So far we got meaningless threads everywhere, I think casebook users count went down since he started his "I think I found him" thread.

[Brenda]

.

It's my understanding that Pierre thinks the murderer accessed 26 Dorset Street, entered Mary's room through the "secret door" and then exited again using 26 Dorset Street. He thinks the police boarded up 26 Dorset Street after the murder to conceal whatever magic evidence was in there that the police wanted no one to discover.

[David Orsam]

He thinks the police boarded up 26 Dorset Street after the murder to conceal whatever magic evidence was in there that the police wanted no one to discover.

Hi Brenda,

That brings three further questions to mind:

1. What was the magic evidence (in Pierre's mind) that required the windows to be boarded up?

2. Am I not right in thinking that there must have been a wall or partition between the shed/storage area and the passageway to the stairs which was adjacent to Kelly's room? In other words, there was no line of sight from the windows of 26 Dorset Street to the partition of 13 Miller's Court???

3. If I'm wrong about 2 above (or even if I'm right), then is it not the case that the magic evidence would have been visible to all the tenants of Miller's Court as they entered and exited the building via the staircase?

[Brenda]

.

Hi David,

1. The only evidence I could think of to hide would be blood evidence. I cannot think of any evidence that hanging a sheet would not suffice instead of the expense and manpower of boarding up. (Though I think it has been sufficiently proven that the place was boarded up before the murders) And if the 26 Dorset Street sketch is correct, that was one big boarding up job!

2. I think you would be correct about that.

3. Ditto!

[David Orsam]

Hi David,

1. The only evidence I could think of to hide would be blood evidence. I cannot think of any evidence that hanging a sheet would not suffice instead of the expense and manpower of boarding up. (Though I think it has been sufficiently proven that the place was boarded up before the murders) And if the 26 Dorset Street sketch is correct, that was one big boarding up job!

2. I think you would be correct about that.

3. Ditto!

Thanks Brenda. It looks like you've just destroyed Pierre's theory so I do hope he is still talking to you!

[Brenda]

.

Thanks Brenda. It looks like you've just destroyed Pierre's theory so I do hope he is still talking to you!

Well, I was under the impression that Pierre had a "full-blown theory" regarding the Whitechapel murderer, I have been very surprised to see him concentrating solely on MJK. There are at least 4 other murders that are receiving no attention at all....why isn't he trying to stimulate discussion about any of those murders?

[Robert St Devil]

Hi.

Id think if you solved one, you might have a crack at solving the others. But thats not important. I think that there is another question going ignored:

Even if there is a fully functioning door in the middle of the partitioned wall that has been nailed shut, how would the killer know about it? Or how did the killer get into the shed in the first place?

[GUT]

Well, I was under the impression that Pierre had a "full-blown theory" regarding the Whitechapel murderer, I have been very surprised to see him concentrating solely on MJK. There are at least 4 other murders that are receiving no attention at all....why isn't he trying to stimulate discussion about any of those murders?

And many don't even think MJK was a ripper victim.

[Abby Normal]

No, Michael. It doesn´t. This does:

You see 26 Dorset Street to the right and it is boarded up. The Evening Express is another source for this. Go back in the thread and you will find it.

Regards Pierre

Hi Pierre
In that picture it looks like what you think is something boarded up is simply a wooden gate or garage/shed door.

More so since the two windows to the left look definitely not boarded up.

[Pierre]

Hi Pierre
In that picture it looks like what you think is something boarded up is simply a wooden gate or garage/shed door.

More so since the two windows to the left look definitely not boarded up.

Hi,

haven´t you read the article in the Evening Express?

The two windows to the left have nothing to do with this. They belong to McCarthy´s shop.

Regards Pierre