Anyone seen this before??

[packers stem]

Further to the right there is a double headed(back to back) characature as well :-)

[packers stem]

I feel sad doing this because I really hate looking at the photos of the dead (and dissected) Mary. To me they are the worst atrocity photographs of the 19th Century (possibly worse than those from the Shoah of World War II except in number of victims).

First, looking at it honestly I thought of Roshach "ink blot" tests. After all, you are supposed to read what the blot looks like.

Yes, I see several arrangements on the wall that can be imagined as faces. But this is not difficult to figure out. Even without additional staining on the walls from poor Mary's blood splattering on them, she was living in a poor neighborhood, in a cheap lodging house, and I don't think a happy staff was available to do thorough room cleaning in her lodgings regarding her walls. Basically it is one's imagination to do the rest in her soiled rooms.

One of the faces made me think of a recent photograph that UFO lovers were pointing to as proof of extra-terrestrial life on Mars - an apparent large carved head. It was (when the picture was more carefully examined) chance rock formations. No sphinx need apply.

One of the faces made me think of Queen Elizabeth I of England. As she died in 1603 I felt she could not be a relevant suspect.

Jeff

Hi Jeff
I'm with you on the photos and usually try not to even look...it was someone mentioned the FM and I was wondering why I could never spot it...the truth is its only visible on the brighter photo.
Reason I've posted this is that it looks nothing at all like blood splashes. It was a painted wall I think and not papered so we can rule out patterns from paper...they look for all the world like excellent sketches to me.
So as far as I'm concerned it's circumstantial evidence
If I can get that image by taking a photo of a photo in a book on my mobile I wonder how well it could be enhanced from the original photo under lab conditions
The possibility of sketches on Kelly's wall...how would Sickert fans react to the possibility
Either way it's something new found

[GUT]

Hi Jeff
I'm with you on the photos and usually try not to even look...it was someone mentioned the FM and I was wondering why I could never spot it...the truth is its only visible on the brighter photo.
Reason I've posted this is that it looks nothing at all like blood splashes. It was a painted wall I think and not papered so we can rule out patterns from paper...they look for all the world like excellent sketches to me.
So as far as I'm concerned it's circumstantial evidence
If I can get that image by taking a photo of a photo in a book on my mobile I wonder how well it could be enhanced from the original photo under lab conditions
The possibility of sketches on Kelly's wall...how would Sickert fans react to the possibility
Either way it's something new found

Circumstantial evidence of what.

I once owned a rental property (never again) and when one lot of tenant left there were all sorts of drawings on one wall.

So what.

[GUT]

Probably proves it was Van Gogh.

[packers stem]

Probably proves it was Van Gogh.

Who knows GUT
All I know is that 36 hours ago I was convinced by the possibility of a fenian conspiracy...
Now I just don't know.
Blood splashes they ain't...have seen somewhere that Kelly was no mean artist so could have been hers but....would anyone draw what looks like a devil next to the bed...maybe,who knows

[DJA]

Is this the Casebook equivalent of a Horshack test?

Fixed

[GUT]

Fixed

[packers stem]

Fixed

What's fixed DJA?
This is a photo off an official Kelly photo,we've all seen it many times,just never spotted it.Only change i've made is to try to enhance the contrast slightly after i've snapped it and then to crop to enable it to be uploaded.
I ain't writing a book,i've no theory ,it's just something i've spotted.
Everyone can check it out for themselves from the correct photo.
First time i saw this version was in Beggs uncensored facts 1988 i think...i didn't spot it till yesterday

[GUT]

What's fixed DJA?
This is a photo off an official Kelly photo,we've all seen it many times,just never spotted it.Only change i've made is to try to enhance the contrast slightly after i've snapped it and then to crop to enable it to be uploaded.
I ain't writing a book,i've no theory ,it's just something i've spotted.
Everyone can check it out for themselves from the correct photo.
First time i saw this version was in Beggs uncensored facts 1988 i think...i didn't spot it till yesterday

Read what DJA quoted and compare it to what he quoted.

Boy you can see things in photos but not in altered quotes.

[DJA]

Let's play "Spot the Baphomet" !

[GUT]

Let's play "Spot the Baphomet" !

Actually never been able to see that either.

Guess my imagination just let's me down.

[packers stem]

Read what DJA quoted and compare it to what he quoted.

Boy you can see things in photos but not in altered quotes.

Heard of rorschach test if thats whats being referred to but dont get the 'fixed'

[GUT]

And have you never heard of Horseshack?

Maybe you're just too young.

[packers stem]

Actually never been able to see that either.

Guess my imagination just let's me down.

imagination not required ,just eyesight without blinkers
My 11 and 13 year olds needed no more than a couple of seconds and my ex could see it before even finding her glasses....

[packers stem]

And have you never heard of Horseshack?

Maybe you're just too young.

Nope and i don't feel young after 30 years of reading ripper books