My attempt to decipher the MJK in situ photograph

[Rosella]

I think you have got it right. It's a horrible and haunting image and it's hard for me when looking at what is left of the victim's face to even see where her eyes are.

[Pcdunn]

I think you have worked it out fairly well. It is interesting that part of the sheet on her upraised leg resembles a knife, isn't it?

I really want to say that the object under the table is part of the bedding, or a towel, or some rags-- but it is hard not to visually matrix something resembling a skinned-off face. Isn't that a horrible image?!

[Defective Detective]

So for a longtime I've had a lot of difficulty looking at this photograph - it's indistinct enough for me to kind of blank at it whenever I try to figure out exactly what I'm looking at. At length I've decided to try to show you what I see when I look at it, and I hope some of you can tell me if I've got the right of it or not.

I've kind of tried to keep it color co-ordinated. And I hope you can read my paint-writing; I did this in a bit of a hurry, and it looks a bit like a toddler did it. At any rate, am I looking at this properly?



In particular, I'm trying to figure out why it looks as if Mary Kelly doesn't have much of a pelvis, whether or not her left arm and right leg are under covers or exposed, and what it is that's underneath the table.