Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MJK's photo censored/vandalised?
Collapse
X
-
My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mark J D View Post
"One day men will look back and say I gave birth to the twentieth century..."
As I once heard a man say in a film...
M."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View PostI'm glad more people are talking about this. I thought there was something wrong with me that I couldn't decipher a single feature from that grisly image.
Mark's theory would indeed go some way in explaining why I too have struggled to decipher anything coherent in terms of Mary's face.
Comment
-
Found a couple of what appear to non edited versions of the original image and tried to highlight where I believe the eyes nose and mouth are on the body.
I just think that due to the savage nature of the cuts, blood and hair - we don't get a clear view of her facial features such as her eyes nose and mouth. I don't believe any editing or doctoring has gone on here.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Where's the original located?JtRmap.com<< JtR Interactive Map
JtRmap FORM << Use this form to make suggestions for map annotations
---------------------------------------------------
JtR3d.com << JtR 3D & #VR Website
---------------------------------------------------
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by erobitha View Post
Good question. I am not 100% certain these are the original copies I found.JtRmap.com<< JtR Interactive Map
JtRmap FORM << Use this form to make suggestions for map annotations
---------------------------------------------------
JtR3d.com << JtR 3D & #VR Website
---------------------------------------------------
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ms Diddles View Post
Agreed, Harry!
Mark's theory would indeed go some way in explaining why I too have struggled to decipher anything coherent in terms of Mary's face.
Originally posted by erobitha View PostFound a couple of what appear to non edited versions of the original image and tried to highlight where I believe the eyes nose and mouth are on the body.
I just think that due to the savage nature of the cuts, blood and hair - we don't get a clear view of her facial features such as her eyes nose and mouth. I don't believe any editing or doctoring has gone on here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harry D View Post... I can now discern the mouth and nose but still struggling with the eyes...
M.(Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by erobitha View PostFound a couple of what appear to non edited versions of the original image and tried to highlight where I believe the eyes nose and mouth are on the body.
I just think that due to the savage nature of the cuts, blood and hair - we don't get a clear view of her facial features such as her eyes nose and mouth. I don't believe any editing or doctoring has gone on here.
Best wishes,
Tristan
Comment
-
Originally posted by Losmandris View Post... like as Mark J D has proposed it has been scratched over with a stylus of some sort...
... but surely it is pretty unlikely that the late-Victorian mindset -- which backed away even from publicly describing Nichols' wounds in detail! -- would have allowed an accurate photo of Kelly's ravaged face to be passed down to posterity? Might we not, at the very least, be looking at a face deliberately rendered indistinct by a gauze placed on the flesh or a barrier put over the image before it was copied?
M.(Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)
Comment
Comment