Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sexuality

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
    Hi All,

    Putting aside for one moment all the decades of accepted Ripper folklore, has anyone ever considered that in the complete obliteration of sexuality the Millers Court victim may have been a man?

    Regards,

    Simon
    OH FOR GODS SAKE, you are kidding right !

    Comment


    • #17
      Hi MalcolmX,

      I would direct you to post #14.

      Regards,

      Simon
      Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

      Comment


      • #18
        Apologies to Simon for being off topic

        Phil,

        I respectfully decline your request.

        Regards,
        Monty
        Monty

        https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...t/evilgrin.gif

        Author of Capturing Jack the Ripper.

        http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/d/1445621622

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Simon Wood View Post
          "...Just such a case might have occurred in one of the so called Whitechapel murders in London, in the years 1887-89. Here nine women were murdered and mutilated by an unknown assassin. In the particular illustrative instance, the woman was murdered in a bedroom...

          ...."In this case, to be sure, all the organs except the heart were found scattered around the room, and showed the sex without doubt.

          "But if all the organs and parts had been taken away or the body exposed to the effects of decomposition, a careful preparation of the skeleton would have been imperative to decide that the body was that of a woman..."
          Hi Simon,

          I would direct you back to your post #14, which is clearly describing a case (that of the Miller's Court victim) where gender would have been a bugger to establish had certain clues not been left behind that removed any reasonable doubt that the body was female. Anyone still considering this one may have been male would be advised to read your quote carefully.

          Sexuality, of course, is quite a different matter, and always a bugger to establish beyond doubt, with or without a pulse. So has anyone considered that the victim may have been a necrophiliac who committed suicide so they could practise self abuse? Not yet? Thank Christ for that. Give it time.

          'Twas but another passing thought.

          Love,

          Caz
          X
          Last edited by caz; 12-07-2011, 06:56 PM.
          "Comedy is simply a funny way of being serious." Peter Ustinov


          Comment


          • #20
            Hi Caz,

            Yes, always read the small print.

            Have a happy Christmas and the very best of New Years.

            Regards,

            Simon
            Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

            Comment


            • #21
              Hmmmmm

              Mary Kelly might have been a ladyboy?

              Now here's a new possibility to discuss.

              Not.
              allisvanityandvexationofspirit

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Malcolm X View Post
                OH FOR GODS SAKE, you are kidding right !
                Umm, yes, I would hope so, because this is quite bizarre to even consider. LOL

                Comment


                • #23
                  ''Ludicrous'' an an insult to the memory of Mary Jane Kelly .
                  'It doesn't matter how beautiful your theory is. It doesn't matter how smart you are . If it doesn't agree with experiment, its wrong'' . Richard Feynman

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by FISHY1118 View Post
                    ''Ludicrous'' an an insult to the memory of Mary Jane Kelly .
                    I agree Fishy the idea is an insult to the memory of Mary Jane Kelly.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X