Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Welsh Mining Disasters

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Welsh Mining Disasters

    So I've given up searching for Mary Jane Kelly in Free BMD. At least for the time being

    But if anything in her story is true it might lead us to her. And I've started checking mine explosions to see if I can find her husband. This is a useful but horrifying and saddening list. You'll see that most of these terrible events are not explosions per se but collapses and equipment failure. However one of the worst actual explosions occurred at the Prince of Wales Colliery in Abercarn in 1878, and is a pretty good candidate for the event that killed Mary Jane's husband. No fewer than 268 miners were killed in horrific circumstances during and after an explosion probably caused by a safety helmet igniting gas.

    The following age-appropriate Davies/Davis men died in that tragedy:

    WH Davies 16 Alfred Davis 18 Daniel Davis 24 David Davis 21 Edward Davis 23 James Davis 29 Thomas Davis 16 William Davis 18.

    It might be worth checking to see who these men were married to.

  • #2
    Chava, I know that I've been down these lists and checked possible spouses, and I believe that Gareth has done the same (and probably better). I didn't find anything convincing, and I don't think Gareth did (Gareth??).

    As I'm actually living in Abercarn right now (parents have been here for years), I've had the opportunity to check local sources for info on that particular disaster, but came up empty handed. Of course, being 1878, if Mary (and I checked anyhow since it is such a big if) was being honest about her age, she would have only been 14 or 15 when the event occurred...seems unlikely that she could have been married for a couple of years at that juncture).

    Am currently checking out other coal/steel locations in the area...
    best,

    claire

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by claire View Post
      Chava, I know that I've been down these lists and checked possible spouses, and I believe that Gareth has done the same (and probably better). I didn't find anything convincing, and I don't think Gareth did (Gareth??).
      Hi Claire & Chava

      I have a couple of books listing the dead of most of the fatal accidents of the South Wales coalfields, and the redoubtable Chris Scott has done some research in this area too, I believe. Speaking for myself, I've not found any plausible candidates for a "Mr MJK" amongst these martyrs to the mines... sadly.

      Of course, as these lists (and/or newspaper reports) tend to focus on tunnels collapsing, landslides or gas explosions, it's faintly possible that "Mr MJK" died in another kind of accident, a more "individual" disaster, perhaps. I've speculated previously - out of desperation! - that "an explosion" could have referred to an accident with (say) a detonator above-ground, which wouldn't necessarily have been reported in the press - certainly if it were only "Mr MJK" who was thus killed.
      Kind regards, Sam Flynn

      "Suche Nullen" (Nietzsche, Götzendämmerung, 1888)

      Comment


      • #4
        Yes, that's kind of my approach these days--desperate speculation... There's sod all in the remaining records of the churches round these parts...although they're a million miles from complete. I've got to the point where I am contemplating pulling out the fireplaces in my house, convinced I'll find the marriage photo...
        best,

        claire

        Comment


        • #5
          Hello you all!

          And one addition to these endless MJK speculations;

          MJK could also have added her friend's story to her own one...

          All the best
          Jukka
          "When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"

          Comment


          • #6
            I know, I know. I've checked everyone out as well. But I'm convinced that Mary Jane Kelly wasn't her name, so I'm certain we won't be able to find her on those names. It's true that her story could be 100% fiction. However I think there might be some tiny little chunks of substance there, because it's really hard to remember a story that's completely made-up.

            Comment


            • #7
              One question that is important in the search is this:
              Even if every other aspect of the story as related by Barnett were true, if the woman's name was NOT Mary Jane Kelly or any feasible variant thereof, would we stand any chance of finding out who she really was?

              Without a name to work from the task seems hopeless. Even statetments from Barnett that seem precise and concrete drift through our fingers like smoke if we do not know her name. His assertion that she was legally married to a miner named Davies who died in an explosion some time in the early 1880s is soon revealed as a hydra to the researcher. At that period mine deaths were, sadly, far from uncommon and looking for a Davies in Wales is an archivist's nightmare!
              There are still lots of loose ends that MAY one day be revealed from other sources such as:
              - Who was Mrs Buki?
              - Who was the French woman who ran the "gay house" in Knightsbridge?
              - Is there any record of Kelly's alleged trip to France in 1884 or early 1885?
              - What was the origin of the other names in the early press reports - Lawrence, Fisher and Mccarthy?
              - Why was Barnett insistent that the French form of her name (Marie Jeanette) was the true form given her at birth and not some affectation from her days in France?
              There may one day be an earthshattering breakthrough but, personally, I doubt it. Small nuggets of information are more likely in my opinion.

              Personally I find the most frustrating thing is that we are almost certainly looking at records of her without knowing it. If the outline of the Barnett story is true we would expect her to appear in the official record at least 4 times:
              the 1871 census (presumably in Wales) when she would have been about 8
              the 1881 census
              a marriage certificate
              a death certificate
              The last is the only one we know and that bears the version of her name as supplied by Barnett.

              All I can say is rest in peace, Mary Jane, and maybe one day we will put a name to you.

              Chris S
              Last edited by Chris Scott; 03-01-2010, 11:58 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Hi Chris!

                You've done amazing work in this area!

                If her name was entirely made-up we'll never find her. I am going under the (dangerous) assumption that some form of Mary was her first name so I've been checking Marie/Mari/Moira/Mairead. I also think she likely had two names because people who go by different names tend to use the same kind of cadence as their real names. So I've also been checking Mary Anne as well as variations of Jane.

                The other thing I'm looking for is the ironmaster of Carmarthen/Caernarvon. Her dad may well have come across to the mainland to work in an ironworks. That part may be true. As for the husband, I long thought it was an affecting story made up for the punters, but it's something else that could well be true so that's why I started hunting down disasters. Interestingly there aren't all that many Davies/Davis explosion victims that are the right age. But I've checked all the ones I can find and I don't think any of them are right for Mary Jane.

                I'm not buying her story that Marie Jeanette was her real name. I think that's highly unlikely and was probably used to tone her image up a little with the tricks. I don't think passports were in general use during the time she apparently went to France, but it's entirely possible that she did go. There were a lot of UK tarts in Dieppe bordels and probably all along the Channel coast.

                Also I think we need to add a couple of years or so to her apparent age. I doubt she'd tell the truth about that...

                Comment


                • #9
                  Excellent work Chava (as ever). I am going to get a bit picky about Welsh geography now, but only in the spirit of investigation. I am in no way saying your find could not be correct. After all, that's the problem with MJK isn't it - it's so hard to know which (if any) pieces of info to include or exclude, and each seems to mitigate against the other the more searching you do, and change the whole picture.

                  However, as Gareth would no doubt point out with much more authority, Abercarn is an awful long way from any potential mispronunciaton/mishearing of 'Carmarthen' (it is even further from the real one), the nearest I can find being Cwmafan which is a touch under 48 miles away, and which I know has been mentioned by Gareth in the past as a possible alternative for the 'Carmarthen' allegedly mentioned to Barnett by Kelly.

                  Interestingly, however, it is much closer (a rough 10 miles) from Cwmbran (Carm-braan in the same kind of English mispronunciation which could render Carmarthen, Caernarfon and Cwmafan as near-hononyms - and of which I was regularly guilty when I first moved to Wales!). Indeed, the area's postal address now is Abercarn, Cwmbran (much the same as Cwmafan, Neath, for example). It's only one syllable of course but is it out of the question that Kelly's Irish tinted 'Cwmbran' came across as something more akin to 'Carm-bran', and that when a forgetful Barnett tried desperately (and under interrogation) to remember the place she had mentioned, that if he had heard of, say, Carmarthen, or Caernarfon, that he came up with the wrong one?

                  It seems a little far fetched, but there it is. Make of it what you will.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    One other alleged incident for which records would certainly have existed is her alleged lengthy stay in the Cardiff infirmary. But we have to be careful in that if memory serves me right there was more than one such institution in Cardiff.
                    Might be worth checking the 1881 census as this was just about the time she was supposed to be there (after the death of her husband)
                    Barnett said she married when just sixteen (about 1879) and the husband died 18 months to 2 years after
                    Might be worth checking for French born women living in Knightsbridge in 1881 to see what sort of household they ran - look for disproportionate number of young women from varying parts of the country...
                    Happy hunting!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Hello you all!

                      The best maybe so far, I think, is the one presented on the "Dissertations" section called "The origins of Mary Kelly" by Peter Birchwood. However, it's far from perfect, as usual with MJK's backround research...

                      One tiny clue was found by Gareth. "Mary Ballina", a singer in a Vaudeville group. There was no "Ballina" in the LVP census as a last-name, but a small town in Limerick.

                      So; the only piece of art, that is known about MJK, is singing. Since she talked about Limerick concerning her backround, "Mary Ballina" could be "our" Mary.

                      However, probably there aren't any clues about her either...

                      All the best
                      Jukka
                      "When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Simon Wood has provided evidence that the 2nd Battalion Scots Guards was indeed in Ireland in 1888.
                        Just as Barnett said. And how could he know that ? It cannot be a fabricated story. He must have learnt this from Mary.
                        If we could find one Henry Kelly (or John Kelly?) in the army archives...then we could say for sure MJK is MJK.

                        Amitiés all,
                        David

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The problem being, though, Dave, that if Kelly was an assumed name, her brother would not have been called Kelly either. Besides which, I have a sneaking suspicion that Kelly's soldier visitor was a paramour rather than her brother. Hence I anticipate another dead end in this context.

                          Regards.

                          Garry Wroe.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Hi Garry,

                            You're too pessimistic!
                            I'm not (must be the sweet weather announcing spring in Provence).
                            Let's check the records first, if possible.

                            Amitiés,
                            David

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Hello David!

                              But so many of us have tried to find the brother and Mary as well...

                              Well, we are all searching that crucial needle in a haystack here!

                              All the best
                              Jukka
                              "When I know all about everything, I am old. And it's a very, very long way to go!"

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X