MJK1 & MJK3 camera positions - plan view. (Warning - graphic images)

[FISHY1118]

You misunderstand RD, thr claim is there was NO body in the room., no one was killed there

Steve

Surely an explanation is warranted to this bizarre nonsensical claim.?

[Simon Wood]

Steve,

You seem to be getting the picture.

Simon

[Elamarna]

Apparently MJK committed suicide.


Surely not?



RD

You misunderstand RD, thr claim is there was NO body in the room., no one was killed there

Steve

[The Rookie Detective]

What ? That there was no murder of Mary Kelly? That sounds a bit odd.

Apparently MJK committed suicide.


Surely not?



RD

[FISHY1118]

You have understand that Simon believes there was no body at all.
He is of course entitled to his views, but to date there is no verified evidence that the images are fake.

I intend no disrespect to Simon by the way.

Steve

What ? That there was no murder of Mary Kelly? That sounds a bit odd.

[Elamarna]

Well, unfortunately, it looks like that project is halted now, given that those photos are confirmed as fakes. I've no interest in spending so much time and energy creating something from fake photos. There's no benefit in that.

Perhaps we need a vote on those photos?

You have understand that Simon believes there was no body at all.
He is of course entitled to his views, but to date there is no verified evidence that the images are fake.

I intend no disrespect to Simon by the way.

Steve

[Elamarna]

Richard,

There is plenty of evidence pointing to MJK2 and MJK 3 being faked.

I was cheated and deceived by these two photographs for quite a time, but no longer.

Am I privy to information that you are not? No. All the evidence is sitting there for all to see. Believers in the pics simply need to snap out of the fugue they're in. I did. It's liberating.

I don't know who took MJK2. Yes, he had a camera, but it's who paid him to press the shutter that really matters.

As to your other questions, it gives me no pleasure to agree with you.

Simon

So no actual proof, Simply your interpretation and opinions then Simon.

Steve

[Kattrup]

Well, unfortunately, it looks like that project is halted now, given that those photos are confirmed as fakes. I've no interest in spending so much time and energy creating something from fake photos. There's no benefit in that.

Perhaps we need a vote on those photos?

No need, Richard, rest assured that it’s always a good idea to ignore Simon Wood’s convoluted conspiracy theories.
They are no confirmation of anything, I guarantee it.

[richardh]

Richard,

Yes, I can guarantee that MJK2 and MJK3 are 100% fakes.

Simon

That’a great news, Richard, I look forward to seeing it.

Well, unfortunately, it looks like that project is halted now, given that those photos are confirmed as fakes. I've no interest in spending so much time and energy creating something from fake photos. There's no benefit in that.

Perhaps we need a vote on those photos?

[Kattrup]

I am currently in the process of totally redoing my 3D renders of No13 based entirely on these two photos.

That’a great news, Richard, I look forward to seeing it.

[Simon Wood]

Richard,

Yes, I can guarantee that MJK2 and MJK3 are 100% fakes.

Simon

[Enigma]

I've found the old animations of Mary's left hand.
Uploaded here:
https://jtr3d.com/mary-kelly-hand-position-animations/

Good work. Thanks Richard.

Regards, Gazza

[richardh]

Richard,

There is plenty of evidence pointing to MJK2 and MJK 3 being faked.

I was cheated and deceived by these two photographs for quite a time, but no longer.

Am I privy to information that you are not? No. All the evidence is sitting there for all to see. Believers in the pics simply need to snap out of the fugue they're in. I did. It's liberating.

I don't know who took MJK2. Yes, he had a camera, but it's who paid him to press the shutter that really matters.

As to your other questions, it gives me no pleasure to agree with you.

Simon

Okay.
thanks for the reply.

So can you guarantee to me that both those photos are certainly 100% fakes?
I am currently in the process of totally redoing my 3D renders of No13 based entirely on these two photos. So it will save me a great deal of time and frustration if you can confirm the photos are fake.

Many thanks

[Simon Wood]

Richard,

There is plenty of evidence pointing to MJK2 and MJK 3 being faked.

I was cheated and deceived by these two photographs for quite a time, but no longer.

Am I privy to information that you are not? No. All the evidence is sitting there for all to see. Believers in the pics simply need to snap out of the fugue they're in. I did. It's liberating.

I don't know who took MJK2. Yes, he had a camera, but it's who paid him to press the shutter that really matters.

As to your other questions, it gives me no pleasure to agree with you.

Simon

[richardh]

You've all been cheated and deceived. MJK2 and MJK3 were faked. They were not taken sequentially, and there is nothing to be found in one photograph which confirms detail from the other. Even the "left" hand seen in MJK3 is wrong, being the "right" hand of the person hiding just out of plain sight.

Simon
'MJK2 and MJK3' were faked - Have you got verifiable evidence that you can share with us?
If 'you've all been cheated and deceived', why haven't you? Are you privy to information that we are not?
Do you know who faked them?

Finally, is there any point continuing to deconstruct/analyse them or indeed create 3D/VRs reconstructions if they are essentially worthless and legitimately have nothing whatsoever to do with the case?

It would be good to know once and for all if these photos can be totally discounted so we don't have to waste any more precious time on them. I can then delete all my 3D work on these photos and concentrate on legitimate case material.

thanks in advance.