If Kelly was married, even for a short time, she would have taken her husband's name and it would be on all her documents, if she had any. So why isn't she presenting herself as 'Mary Jane Davies'?
If she's going with the 'I got married and my poor young husband died down the pit' story, why wouldn't she have kept his name as a pathetic reminder of the love she had lost and a useful way to tug at the heartstrings of sentimental punters.
If she didn't get married at all, and her single name was Kelly, she could still come up with some catastrophic event involving a young miner/steelworker/whatever called Kelly who she loved and lost.
But she says her married name was Davies, and her single name was Kelly, and she reverted to it after her husband died. This isn't a useful story for her. Because, if she loved her husband, she would have kept his name.
So I humbly submit that 'Mary Jane Kelly' was a nom de guerre, and we will never find her under that name.
If she's going with the 'I got married and my poor young husband died down the pit' story, why wouldn't she have kept his name as a pathetic reminder of the love she had lost and a useful way to tug at the heartstrings of sentimental punters.
If she didn't get married at all, and her single name was Kelly, she could still come up with some catastrophic event involving a young miner/steelworker/whatever called Kelly who she loved and lost.
But she says her married name was Davies, and her single name was Kelly, and she reverted to it after her husband died. This isn't a useful story for her. Because, if she loved her husband, she would have kept his name.
So I humbly submit that 'Mary Jane Kelly' was a nom de guerre, and we will never find her under that name.
Comment