Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The pail

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The pail

    After the murder of Mary Jane Kelly a pail was carried away from the murder site in Millerīs Court.

    It was covered with a newspaper but it was not taken to the mortuary. Instead, it was taken to the house of Dr Phillips.

    What was in the pail?

    Why was it taken to the house of Phillips?

    Regards, Pierre
    Last edited by Pierre; 11-08-2016, 02:22 PM.

  • #2
    1) It was stated to contain portions of the woman's body.
    2) Dr Phillips was Divisional Surgeon - why it went to his house I know not.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Pierre View Post
      After the murder of Mary Jane Kelly a pail was carried away from the murder site in Millerīs Court.

      It was covered with a newspaper but it was not taken to the mortuary. Instead, it was taken to the house of Dr Phillips.

      What was in the pail?

      Why was it taken to the house of Phillips?

      Regards, Pierre


      Pierre it is an interesting question, as i replied when you asked this in another thread, I have no idea.


      how reliable are the sources? is there more than one?



      Steve

      Comment


      • #4
        Maybe he wanted to make sure no organs went missing at the mortuary?

        Pat....

        Comment


        • #5
          Maybe it was Blothchy's pail of grog used to preserve them
          G U T

          There are two ways to be fooled, one is to believe what isn't true, the other is to refuse to believe that which is true.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Pierre View Post
            After the murder of Mary Jane Kelly a pail was carried away from the murder site in Millerīs Court.

            It was covered with a newspaper but it was not taken to the mortuary. Instead, it was taken to the house of Dr Phillips.

            What was in the pail?

            Why was it taken to the house of Phillips?

            Regards, Pierre
            I would say because the contents were small, and to keep them safe he held them at his home overnight. He would have them brought to the autopsy the next morning.
            Regards, Jon S.

            Comment


            • #7
              If what the pail contained had been case-enlightening, the coroner would have had it presented during his questioning of Dr. Phillips at the inquest. But the contents of the pail are never brought up, so...

              It was probably wound related - the organs on the bed; the liver, to check for poison or alcohol. Part of the wound information to be given at the follow-up. Autopsy information that he needed to gather by examining her organs, but having to safe-guard them at his house against the "mortuary rituals" when receiving a body.


              That, or he was sifting thru the ashes for possible body parts.
              there,s nothing new, only the unexplored

              Comment


              • #8
                Not aware of any pail being taken to Dr Phillip's residence.
                As I reckon the Bagster knew Jack the Ripper,I'd have been all over that info like a rash!
                Source?
                Incidentally,Phillip's house was at Spital Square,an extension of Hanbury Street. It's on Jack's route to and from work. They were peers.
                My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

                Comment


                • #9
                  The only source I've found is the Daily News 10th Nov 1888;

                  "At four o'clock in the afternoon the body was removed from Dorset street to Shoreditch Mortuary, which stands at the back of Shoreditch Church. The mutilated remains were placed in a coarse coffin, which had apparently been used on many previous occasions for the conveyance of the dead, and which was partially covered with a coarse canvas cloth. The straps of the coffin were sealed. The coffin was conveyed in a one horse ordinary furniture van, and was escorted by several constables under Sergeant Betham. A large crowd followed. At the mortuary another throng was waiting to see the coffin transferred to the building. The photographer who had been called in to photograph the room removed his camera from the premises at half past four, and shortly afterwards a detective officer carried from the house a pail, with which he left in a four wheel cab. The pail was covered with a newspaper, and was stated to contain portions of the woman's body. It was taken to the house of Dr. Phillips, 2 Spital square. The windows of the room where the crime was committed were boarded up and a padlock put on the door. The streets were patrolled by the police all last evening, and no one was allowed to loiter near the place. At night the neighbourhood was a scene of restless excitement and activity, the streets being filled with thousands of idlers, attracted doubtless by morbid curiosity.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The Morning Advertiser 10 Nov also carries the same paragraph, although lacking the final line from the Daily News' account;

                    "At four o'clock yesterday afternoon the body was removed from Dorset-street to Shoreditch mortuary, which stands at the back of Shoreditch Church. The mutilated remains were placed in a coarse coffin, which had apparently been used on many previous occasions for the conveyance of the dead, and which was partially covered with a coarse canvas cloth. The straps of the coffin were sealed. The coffin was conveyed in a one-horse ordinary furniture-van, and was escorted by several police-constables, under Sergeant Betham. A large mob followed the van to the mortuary, where a crowd was waiting to see the coffin transferred to the building. The photographer who had been called in to photograph the room and the body removed his camera from the premises at half-past four, and shortly afterwards a detective officer carried from the house a pail with which he left in a four-wheel cab. The pail was covered with a newspaper, and it was stated that it contained portions of the woman's body. It was taken to the house of Dr. Phillips, 2 Spital-square. The windows of the room in which the crime was committed were boarded up, and a padlock was put on the door. The streets were patrolled by the police all the evening, and no one was allowed to loiter near the place."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Thanks Joshua


                      steve

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I would think that what was in the pail was the excised materials around Mary and what was on the nighttable. They did what is called a "Volte Face" with the remains, a reconstruction if you will, and that's how they determined what was taken from the room.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Robert St Devil View Post
                          If what the pail contained had been case-enlightening, the coroner would have had it presented during his questioning of Dr. Phillips at the inquest. But the contents of the pail are never brought up, so...

                          It was probably wound related - the organs on the bed; the liver, to check for poison or alcohol. Part of the wound information to be given at the follow-up. Autopsy information that he needed to gather by examining her organs, but having to safe-guard them at his house against the "mortuary rituals" when receiving a body.


                          That, or he was sifting thru the ashes for possible body parts.
                          The mortuary was a small solid brick building behind St Leonard's Church.
                          Two experts were on that Vestry Board and Phillips knew that.

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas..._(toxicologist)



                          This is really interesting.
                          My name is Dave. You cannot reach me through Debs email account

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
                            I would say because the contents were small, and to keep them safe he held them at his home overnight. He would have them brought to the autopsy the next morning.
                            Bet he's wife was happy.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
                              Pierre it is an interesting question, as i replied when you asked this in another thread, I have no idea.

                              how reliable are the sources? is there more than one?

                              Steve
                              Hi Steve,

                              I donīt know how reliable the source(s) are since I have not examined them.

                              David gave us a reference to that source in another thread, so maybe he knows something about the reliability and would like to tell us.

                              Regards, Pierre

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X