Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No Trophies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Beowulf
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Barbara. Thanks.

    Pretty close. Of course, it depends upon the accuracy of her testimony.

    Cheers.
    LC
    But it was not just her testimony.

    "Albert Cadosch had entered the neighbouring yard at 27 Hanbury Street at about 5:30 a.m., and heard voices in the yard followed by the sound of something falling against the fence."

    You'd have to refute two people's time stories.

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
    Hi Michael.

    We are told the backyard door swung closed automatically. Are you suggesting the killer held it open by some means intentionally?

    .
    Hi Jon,

    I dont recall reading that it shut automatically Jon, and in any photos that exist or even a sketch from the period that back door seems to be open.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Christer. Thanks.

    Again, depends on assault time.

    Cheers.
    LC
    The rate of bloodloss ...?

    The best,
    Christer

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    intent

    Hello Damaso. Thanks.

    "He was definitely trying to kill something, and I've never heard of manual strangulation being used to kill animals, so I don't think it's a preposterous assumption that homicide was intended."

    JI tried to strangle his wife. Whoever killed Polly may have begun by striking a blow. But BOTH can result from a gust of anger--lashing out--with no overt intent to kill.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    a pinch of assault

    Hello Christer. Thanks.

    Again, depends on assault time.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Damaso Marte
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    You also assume that Polly's assassin sought to kill. Whence the inference?
    Seriously?

    I know you think that Ischemschidt "didn't know what he was doing" and may have thought that he was butchering a horse, but whoever killed Nichols put his hands around her throat, lowered her unconscious body to the ground, and cut major blood vessels.

    He was definitely trying to kill something, and I've never heard of manual strangulation being used to kill animals, so I don't think it's a preposterous assumption that homicide was intended.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Christer. Thanks.

    So, you have moved it back to 25 minutes? So much for compromise! (heh-heh)

    Seriously, I think the attack was begun around 3.30. I have no idea how long it took before she were unconscious and prostrate. But, as I remarked above, I don't see a long attack. But I could be wrong.

    And I think she was cut right after she were on the ground. But I don't see 25 minutes.

    Cheers.
    LC
    I see ten minutes. Tops. Which tallies nicely with her being cut around the time Lechmere "found" her.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    attack

    Hello Christer. Thanks.

    So, you have moved it back to 25 minutes? So much for compromise! (heh-heh)

    Seriously, I think the attack was begun around 3.30. I have no idea how long it took before she were unconscious and prostrate. But, as I remarked above, I don't see a long attack. But I could be wrong.

    And I think she was cut right after she were on the ground. But I don't see 25 minutes.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    long and short

    Hello Barnaby. Thanks.

    "A week and two days isn't that long."

    But neither is it shortly after.

    You also assume that Polly's assassin sought to kill. Whence the inference?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    [QUOTE]
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Christer. Thanks.

    Well, bleeding occurs at different rates, but I shan't labour the point.
    Of course bleeding occurs at different rates. But just how different can we allow for? You suggest 3.30 as the murder time (perhaps as early as 3.27, actually), and you accept the possibility of Mizen being in place at 3.55. That opens up a gap of 25 minutes, meaning that Nichols would have bled out at a rate of 1,6 decilitres of blood per minute on average...

    Letīs take a look at how quick it CAN be. Hereīs a snippet:

    "A competition for genteshi (butchers) took place on January 26, 2013 in Gecha village of Beregovsky district in Zakarpattya region. Over 70 professional and amateur butchers competed in the contest.
    Contesters had a difficult objective: in limited time the butcher had to prepare the pig for the killing, correctly and quickly empty the carcass of blood, singe it, and properly take it apart. Skilled butchers know that every one of these stages is extremely important, and even the smallest mistake can negatively influence the taste of pork...The winner of the fest was Pavel Bidzil. This permanent contestant of the gastronomic fest managed to disassemble the body of the pig in 8 minutes and 13 seconds, which became his personal record."

    So, a medium size pig was prepared for killing, then it was killed, then it was drained of all blood, then it was singed and butchered into parts - all in 8 minutes and 13 seconds.

    Of course, the pig was alive when killed, meaning that the heartbeats helped the blood along, plus the pig would have been hung neck down, which would also have helped.

    But a person lying down with all neck vessels opened up is also subject to the laws of nature, and Paul did say that he felt her twitching when he felt her breast.

    The blood within us takes a minute to pass the heart, all of it. If the main aorta is cut off, we will bleed out in a minutes time.

    Severing the main arteries and all of the other vessels in the neck will bleed a person out in a matter of very few minutes. If the heart is no longer beating when the cut is made, that will slow the process down - but not to twentyfive minutes, reasonably.

    If Lechmere did not do the cutting, then it was done very close in time to his arrival, and not perhaps fifteen to eighteen minutes before it.

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • Barnaby
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Barnaby.

    Difficult to see how a week and two days counts as shortly thereafter.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lynn,

    Maybe that was the next chance he had to kill...Maybe he had a job, maybe the opportunity did not present itself during the times he was on the prowl. A week and two days isn't that long...

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Ah!

    Hello Lucky. Thanks.

    Now I get it.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Lucky
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    I know many public clocks that are not synchronised--even today.
    Hi Lynn

    'even today' - yes, that's my point, there's no LVP timekeeping, there's just timekeeping.

    Best Wishes.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    accuracy

    Hello Barbara. Thanks.

    Pretty close. Of course, it depends upon the accuracy of her testimony.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Beowulf
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Phil. Davis was awake from 3 to 5, by his inquest statement. If the murder were around 4.30, I wonder whether he would have not have heard it? Or possibly have heard people in the passageway?

    Cheers.
    LC
    "At the inquest one of the witnesses, Mrs. Elizabeth Long testified that she had seen Chapman talking to a man at about 5:30 a.m. just beyond the back yard of 29 Hanbury Street, Spitalfields. Mrs. Long described him as over forty, and a little taller than Chapman, of dark complexion, and of foreign, "shabby-genteel" appearance."

    Chapman's body was discovered at just before 6:00 a.m. on the morning of 8 September 1888 by a resident of number 29, market porter John Davis. She was lying on the ground near a doorway in the back yard. John Richardson, the son of a resident of the house, had been in the back yard shortly before 5 a.m. to trim a loose piece of leather from his boot, and carpenter Albert Cadosch had entered the neighbouring yard at 27 Hanbury Street at about 5:30 a.m., and heard voices in the yard followed by the sound of something falling against the fence."



    Doesn't this establish the window of time the murder occurred?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X