Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who was the first clothes-puller?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Robert
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    We'll return to it on an Issy thread.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    oops

    Hello Sally. So sorry. Off topic on account of me.

    Mea culpa.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Sally. Yes, it was decided that a butcher's knife, well ground down, could have done for the first two.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hmm. Well that's very interesting, Lynn. I understand why you favour Isenschmid (?) for Nichols and Chapman; I understand that the police thought they had their man at first.

    And there I go again, woefully off topic.

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Sally View Post
    Hi Curious

    Maria is listed in the 1891 census as a horse flesh dealer. As far as I know, we don't know what she did in 1888. She was employed in a number of trades as we can see from the historic record, including also straw bonnet maker and dressmaker, amongst other things. It looks as though she had no single profession and horse flesh dealer was probably just what she did at the time - who knows for how long - but no more than a few years.

    She wasn't in that line of work when Cross was a child so far as it is possible to tell.

    Thanks, Sally. Interesting information.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    butcher's knife

    Hello Sally. Yes, it was decided that a butcher's knife, well ground down, could have done for the first two.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    tale

    Hello Robert. My conjecture is that, when he was angry, his delusion was of his hated wife frustrating him. (As you recall, he blamed her for the failed business and for having him committed in 1887.) And we know that later he in fact began to strangle her.

    But after Polly (and Annie) was dead, he may have thought the body a dead animal, say, a sheep. That would explain why he thought, and related to the doctor, that he was taking sheep parts to the market for resale. (He mentioned the head, and that would explain why the attempt to remove Annie's head.)

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Wasn't it thought (who by, my memory is useless) that the knife that killed Nichols could have been a butcher's knife?

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Well, with the way you described it, I just thought that an experienced butcher in a state of wrath would easily inflict some very bad cuts.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    delusion

    Hello Robert. Why would that be? Much would depend on which particular delusion he was having.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    yes

    Hello Velma. Yes, that would be the case.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Robert
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Just thinking that Issy would have done a lot more damage to Polly, even if interrupted.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sally
    replied
    Originally posted by curious View Post
    So, that might mean Cross would have access to knives, etc. for JtR's preferred line of work? or even saws, etc., needed to cut up human bodies?

    Wonder if she was in that line of work when he was a child and if he worked in her shop?
    Hi Curious

    Maria is listed in the 1891 census as a horse flesh dealer. As far as I know, we don't know what she did in 1888. She was employed in a number of trades as we can see from the historic record, including also straw bonnet maker and dressmaker, amongst other things. It looks as though she had no single profession and horse flesh dealer was probably just what she did at the time - who knows for how long - but no more than a few years.

    She wasn't in that line of work when Cross was a child so far as it is possible to tell.

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by Sally View Post
    Dave,his mum lived on Pinchin Street and was a horse flesh dealer (amongst other things).
    So, that might mean Cross would have access to knives, etc. for JtR's preferred line of work? or even saws, etc., needed to cut up human bodies?

    Wonder if she was in that line of work when he was a child and if he worked in her shop?

    Leave a comment:


  • curious
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post

    It could also explain why Polly, after her obvious lack of success, headed that way as a default option.

    Cheers.
    LC

    So, perhaps Cross (if he was her killer) did not have to go to Whitechapel Road to hunt for her?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    Tomkins

    Hello Robert. Tomkins said that "women sometimes came up to the gates."

    My (admittedly inductive) inference is that Polly and some others had occasionally come to the Harrison Barber premises to solicit--not without a modicum of success. That would explain why Tomkins said of women that he didn't like them--not that he was a woman hater but perhaps that he wished not to admit to spending an occasional 4d on one.

    It could also explain why Polly, after her obvious lack of success, headed that way as a default option.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X