If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
What Direction Was Polly Travelling When She Was Killed?
Of course, if she entered Bucks Row from Winthrop Street her boots would have made much less noise than if she'd clip-clopped all the way from Brady Street, say.
My guess would be excluding entering via Brown's yard that she came from Court street or more likely Woods Buildings. With the possibility of going to HB first.
2. She was actually woken by the passing train, or by some other sound, and missed Nichols arriving at the site.
Steve
Of course, if she entered Bucks Row from Winthrop Street her boots would have made much less noise than if she'd clip-clopped all the way from Brady Street, say.
Thus I don't think that he was, for example, a horse-slaughterer operating under the delusion that Nichols was a horse. (As has been proposed on this forum before)
And that Isenschmid thought he was butchering a sheep when he mutilated Annie Chapman. Lynn Cates posited that theory, I believe.
Batman, it's the cutting of the carotids, not the jugular that leads to swift unconsciousness and death.
A minor point, but important.
Steve
Your right. I caught that later. Jugular is a vein. However, cutting that vein does have it's own consequences but much slower and is easier to stop with pressure applied. I am pretty sure in few case JtR went through them all down to the neck bone.
JtR killed extremely quickly. He didn't torture them. It was so instant the victims probably weren't alive or conscious of the mutilations. Their jugular was open and a Coke can volume of blood would spew out per second. He needed a fresh dead woman to perform his mutilations. That was his signature. MO was to cut their throats quickly while he had them down on their back.
I think the way he attacked them indicates experience.
Batman, it's the cutting of the carotids, not the jugular that leads to swift unconsciousness and death.
A minor point, but important.
JtR killed extremely quickly. He didn't torture them. It was so instant the victims probably weren't alive or conscious of the mutilations. Their jugular was open and a Coke can volume of blood would spew out per second. He needed a fresh dead woman to perform his mutilations. That was his signature. MO was to cut their throats quickly while he had them down on their back.
I think the way he attacked them indicates experience.
It strikes me that he'd perhaps have needed more experience in slaughtering than he did in overpowering/conning his victims into submission.
Well, Bob Hinton in his book says that bayonets could be bought in East London quite cheap. The thing is, though, that if it was an army man following his training - in his sleep, a it were - then the overkill on Tabram looks very inefficient. Surely the idea was to kill as quickly as possible?
JtR killed extremely quickly. He didn't torture them. It was so instant the victims probably weren't alive or conscious of the mutilations. Their jugular was open and a Coke can volume of blood would spew out per second. He needed a fresh dead woman to perform his mutilations. That was his signature. MO was to cut their throats quickly while he had them down on their back.
I think the way he attacked them indicates experience.
Anyone could try to do it and as we have seen from a whole history of women and men also escaping such attacks and shouting for help getting the killer caught, red-handed in lots of cases or a good composite that eventually identifies them. Then we have women fighting back and leaving marks on their murderer etc.
Anyone could do it, but not everyone could get away with it. Yet JtR did.
Well, Bob Hinton in his book says that bayonets could be bought in East London quite cheap. The thing is, though, that if it was an army man following his training - in his sleep, a it were - then the overkill on Tabram looks very inefficient. Surely the idea was to kill as quickly as possible?
Tabram was killed in a blind fury my a man of 'ungovernable temper'. 😎
Well, Bob Hinton in his book says that bayonets could be bought in East London quite cheap. The thing is, though, that if it was an army man following his training - in his sleep, a it were - then the overkill on Tabram looks very inefficient. Surely the idea was to kill as quickly as possible?
Leave a comment: