Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Those coins and those grapes!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Rosella View Post
    Why would the fact that farthings were supposedly found near the body be not mentioned at Annie's inquest at all but only at Alice McKenzie's a year later? Inspector Reid's mention of these farthings is dismissed by Sugden, who points out that he was on leave during the Chapman inquiry. Jack robbed all the victims of anything remotely valuable, probably any pennies they had on them, Annie's brass rings, why leave farthings there?
    Hi Rosella

    According to Robinson's theory, the coins are relared to some kind of masonic ritual that he located in his research.

    Regards

    Comment


    • #17
      Batty Street

      One thing Robinson missed though is the fact that Grande didn't disappear from the story at all; there was another news story about him on 10th October 1888 where he is reported as taking charge of investigations after finding a clue in the form of a bloody shirt left with a 'Mrs Kali' in Batty St on 9th Oct.
      Debra is there anywhere I can read this? I have been looking into Batty street.

      Pat.....

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Paddy View Post
        Debra is there anywhere I can read this? I have been looking into Batty street.

        Pat.....
        This is the article Pat:


        It appeared in the North Eastern Daily Gazette and the Manchester Courier and Lancashire General Advertiser on Wednesday, October 10, 1888

        Tom Wescott referenced my find in his 2010 article about Grande in Casebook Examiner (issue one??).

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by John G View Post
          Another excellent find, Debra. Maybe Bruce should have employed you as a researcher rather than Keith Skinner!
          Thanks John.
          He probably would have payed better than that Tim Prescott as well.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re Masonic ritual

            The rings thing has, according to Robinson and Co something to do with one of the initiation rituals which include the removal of all metal objects.




            Phil
            Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


            Justice for the 96 = achieved
            Accountability? ....

            Comment


            • #21
              Sat here thinking.

              If the murders had happened today, so much is known in the public forum about Masonic Craft rituals over the whole world, via the internet, that the slightest sign of a rolled up trouser leg would give the game away immediately.

              Makes you wonder whether today's knowledge is being used for solving yesterday's crimes, or being used to fit the crime to the suspect.

              I think the latter.



              Phil
              Chelsea FC. TRUE BLUE. 💙


              Justice for the 96 = achieved
              Accountability? ....

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Phil Carter View Post
                Sat here thinking.

                If the murders had happened today, so much is known in the public forum about Masonic Craft rituals over the whole world, via the internet, that the slightest sign of a rolled up trouser leg would give the game away immediately.

                Makes you wonder whether today's knowledge is being used for solving yesterday's crimes, or being used to fit the crime to the suspect.

                I think the latter.



                Phil
                That's muddled my brain Phil lol
                Haven't started 'they all love jack' and may take me weeks to get through it so I'll let you know
                You can lead a horse to water.....

                Comment


                • #23
                  Hi All,

                  Just to keep the pot boiling and the bandwagon's wheels turning—

                  When Francis Tumblety died in St Louis, his personal effects were itemized and recorded by the attending staff.

                  He had a very expensive gold pocket watch, a large chunk of money...some fine cufflinks, and in his vest pocket two small imitation gold rings sized for women's fingers.

                  Regards,

                  Simon
                  Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by richardh View Post
                    Why were the 'skins' of the grapes not eaten? Pips are spat but I'v never know anyone not eat the skin of a grape. It would take ages to peel a grape!
                    It was a different time Richard.
                    There are some things we just can't be bothered to do today.

                    "Discard your grape skins"


                    The Star, Guernsey, 3 Nov. 1887.
                    Regards, Jon S.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
                      It was a different time Richard.
                      There are some things we just can't be bothered to do today.

                      "Discard your grape skins"


                      The Star, Guernsey, 3 Nov. 1887.
                      Hi Wickerman
                      Suppose they must have 'sucked' the fruit of the grape out and spat out the skin then.might seem a bit tedious to us but we tend to be a bit rushed with our meals as with life in general in modern society.Maybe they just savoured things a little more back in the day
                      You can lead a horse to water.....

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by packers stem View Post
                        ....without packer there are no grapes other than the woman who spotted the stalk in the yard
                        And, the fruit stains on her handkerchief identified by Dr Phillips.
                        Caused by the purple grapes, or by some other fruit at some other time?
                        Regards, Jon S.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
                          And, the fruit stains on her handkerchief identified by Dr Phillips.
                          Caused by the purple grapes, or by some other fruit at some other time?

                          Could have been anything I suppose.Something a bit odd about Phillips at the stride inquest.
                          Wasn't it adjourned for a week and he came back and said what he said about her not eating grapes (or is my memory playing tricks) if so, how could he possibly determine the 'no grapes for several hours' ? Grape,without pip or skin would be digested almost immediately surely.
                          I suspect he was still a bit peeved with Baxter after his treatment at the Chapman inquest
                          You can lead a horse to water.....

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by packers stem View Post
                            ... if so, how could he possibly determine the 'no grapes for several hours' ? Grape,without pip or skin would be digested almost immediately surely.
                            Exactly, the flesh of the grape will disappear in no time, and the body laid for about 38 hours before the autopsy was conducted.

                            We have a handful of witnesses seeing the grapes, a grape stalk, fruit stains, and Packers claim.
                            Conversely, we have no grapes found in the yard, no sign of grapes; no pips, no skins, in the stomach.
                            So was there or wasn't there any grapes?
                            Does it really matter?
                            It doesn't impact the case in any significant way regardless which you choose to believe.

                            The most important contribution by Packer, for me, is his claim to see Stride with a man directly opposite the yard at 12:30, just like PC Smith.
                            Their statements confirm each other, so regardless of the fact Packers stated time's changed, one of his claims (12:00-12:30) finds corroboration in PC Smith, so the other time (11:00-11:30) attributed to Packer, can be dismissed.
                            Regards, Jon S.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              WICKERMAN. Were Elizabeth Strides clothes soaked? I dont know your worth in the Advertiser papers, but one ran a report stating Packer saw the couple standing in the rain for 30 minutes, and commented on the inanity to his wife. JBest says they ran off into the rain after roasting the clerkish man.
                              there,s nothing new, only the unexplored

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Hi All,

                                Oh dear.

                                No takers for Tumblety murdering Chapman.

                                What a shocker.

                                Regards,

                                Simon
                                Never believe anything until it has been officially denied.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X