Originally posted by Wickerman
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Victim's simularities
Collapse
X
-
Bang On The Money
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostThe man:
"Aged about 30, height 5 ft. 6 in.; face sunburnt, with fair moustache; dressed in dark coat, light trousers, and wideawake hat."
Not a world away from later descriptions of a man seen in Hanbury St., & Berner St.
I wouldn't rule this out.
Regards, Jon S.
Very interesting.I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.
Comment
-
Hi Bridewell, the Wilson case is certainly interesting.
Ada Wilson lied and didn't tell the police she was a prostitute and the man a client she brang home.
Same kind of lie with Emma Smith and her unbelievable gang.
Incidentally( ), Ada Wilson lived very close to Fleming's home in the 70s (in Wellington Street, renamed Cyprus Street). Fleming didn't move to Whitechapel until August or September, he was still in BG in early 1888.
Comment
-
I would formulate it another way. I believe the Wilson case could well be an early ripper work, for it is clearly an attempted murder and not a burglary gone wild.
As for Fleming, imo he is the best suspect, obviously the best. But I'm off-thread and I don't want to sadden Mike's Sunday.Last edited by DVV; 01-29-2012, 08:31 PM.
Comment
-
Regarding the "attempted murder", we have indeed every reason to qualify the case as such.
Rose Bierman said : " I don't know what kind of wound Mrs Wilson has received, but it must have been deep, I should say, from the quantity of blood in the passage".
And from ELO, 31 March : "It is thought impossible that the injured woman can recover."
Comment
-
Originally posted by DVV View Post.
Incidentally( ), Ada Wilson lived very close to Fleming's home in the 70s (in Wellington Street, renamed Cyprus Street). Fleming didn't move to Whitechapel until August or September, he was still in BG in early 1888.
Comment
-
Hi Lynn,
You mean it is psychological for all people who say there was a Jack the Ripper? I'm sorry, I don't following your line of thinking. And what do you mean with psychological? That it is "sick" to think of a serial killer when a series of (seemingly) the same murders take place? How would you explain it then? If there are only 2 murderers in this case (as you believe), then one of them must have murdered three/four women (if you consider the C5, either including or excluding Liz Stride). Isn't that by definition a serial killer?
Greetings,
Addy
Comment
Comment