If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
if JTR thinks that he's disturbed the neighbours, he only has to quickly shoot out and wait in Dorset st, before returning 5 mins later, ON TIP TOES !
If he's already in the room with her and kissing her goodbye or lieing in bed with her, how the hell did she manage to scream, fight back and get her bed sheet slashed open, defensive marks, by God he was careless, she should have been so easy to kill, because evidence points to him lunging at her from range, it always has.
why was he so careless when he could have easily killed her within the last 30 mins, in any romantic embrace that you care to imagine, he could have strangled her a thousand times over !!!!
Yes I think MJK's killer also killed the other Ripper victims. I think she was a Ripper victim. Like I said before, the mutilations got worse from Nicholls on. Why do you think she was not a Ripper victim?
I think Stride is a Ripper victim and the Ripper was disturbed. Why? Because the theories about this have convinced me. I don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical.
Yes, he could have sought someone with her own place before. However, he probably didn't study his victims before killing them, he just picked them when he met them.
I don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical.
Addy
Hi, Addy,
This week it has occurred to me that it is not the lack of mutilations that has to be explained, but the method of contact and the differences in the bruises/marks.
If he had been disturbed and not had time for the mutilations, that is one thing.
It seems to me that his different method of attack is what must be explained for Stride to be considered a Ripper victim.
"Yes I think MJK's killer also killed the other Ripper victims. I think she was a Ripper victim. Like I said before, the mutilations got worse from Nicholls on."
Except in the case where they were less.
"Why do you think she was not a Ripper victim?"
To believe she was a ripper victim I would need first to come to believe in a ripper. I don't.
"I think Stride is a Ripper victim and the Ripper was disturbed. Why? Because the theories about this have convinced me. I don't wish to explain the lack of mutilations, I think the theory is logical."
OK. But I should like to see any evidence of disturbance.
"Yes, he could have sought someone with her own place before. However, he probably didn't study his victims before killing them, he just picked them when he met them."
So perhaps it was not very important? And so perhaps Miller's Court was not what he really wanted?
Hello Velma. Precisely! Delighted that this has not escaped your notice.
Cheers.
LC
Isn't it strange how minds work? You can look at something the same way a hundred times, hear it discussed that way a hundred times, until eventually, you question something you never thought to question before.
"Isn't it strange how minds work? You can look at something the same way a hundred times, hear it discussed that way a hundred times, until eventually, you question something you never thought to question before."
I believe you have hit the nail on the head. In psychology, it's a gestalt switch.
Hello David. No, serial killing is of no interest to me whatsoever.
Cheers.
LC
Let me guess...
A serial killer needs at least three victims to be described as such. But you do not believe that any three WM victims perished by the same hand. Therefore you can be deeply interested in the Whitechapel Murders and yet equally uninterested in serial killers. Am I close?
Comment