Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Poll - Whoch non-Canon did Jack kill?
Collapse
X
-
As for the sesquicentennial, Emma Jackson was found with her throat cut in her room on April 4 of 1863.
Leave a comment:
-
Although not likely a Ripper victim, I believe this Friday the 9th is the quasquicentennial of the attack on Emily Horsnail. She died the following day as I recall.
Leave a comment:
-
It's possible that Jack started as a gang member I suppose. But there would have been a very stong temptation for his former cohorts to give him up to justice for financial reward had they suspected him. And they probably would have. "Honour among theives" is a romantic nonsense.
Emma earned her living through prostitution. For some reason this gang decided to "teach her a lesson". That the attack focused on her genitals is horrific and disgusting but it is not surprising.
Leave a comment:
-
Like the other uninterrupted Ripper assaults and unlike Tabram, the focus of the attack on Smith was the genital area. She may have lied about the gang because she was protecting someone like Margery Wren did or perhaps the group attack was true and Jack was the one who made the fatal wound. Other serial killers, like David Roland Waters, have committed their first murder as the member of a gang before going solo.
Leave a comment:
-
Why Emma?
What reason is there to suspect that Emma Smith may have been a Ripper victim? Admittedly, she was the right "type" of victim in the right area but the injuries are quite different. Most significantly, Emma described being attacked by three men; why on Earth would she lie about this?
Best wishes,
Steve.
Leave a comment:
-
Martha
Originally posted by Sister Hyde View Postso in other word, she was not even able to identify the men she had been with?? or maybe they just weren't there. and yeah it's very obvious that they wouldn't come forward. still i doubt that Martha was a ripper victim. but if she was a ripper victim indeed it would narrow the choices of suspects
Leave a comment:
-
so in other word, she was not even able to identify the men she had been with?? or maybe they just weren't there. and yeah it's very obvious that they wouldn't come forward. still i doubt that Martha was a ripper victim. but if she was a ripper victim indeed it would narrow the choices of suspects
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sister Hyde View Postand Connolly gave a very detailed description of the men, is there any clue of who they could have been when putting it together with the other infos about them?
When both The PC and Pearly Poll went to the soldiers barracks for a lineup it was basically a total fiasco. The soldier/s were never identified. Also, tellingly, the soldier/s in question never came forward either.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostSoldier or not, In my mind it is most probable that she was a ripper victim.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sister Hyde View Posti thought martha tabram had been murdered by one of the soldiers she went with that night, or maybe even by Connolly herself. is it really likely that she was a real ripper victim?
Even if martha had been murdered by the soldier, she still could be a ripper victim. As in- the soldier was the ripper. I think too many people don't realize that this is a possibility.
Soldier or not, In my mind it is most probable that she was a ripper victim.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Defective Detective View PostMy position at this moment is: none, but if one, then her.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Sister Hyde View Posti thought martha tabram had been murdered by one of the soldiers she went with that night, or maybe even by Connolly herself. is it really likely that she was a real ripper victim?
My position at this moment is: none, but if one, then her.
Leave a comment:
-
i thought martha tabram had been murdered by one of the soldiers she went with that night, or maybe even by Connolly herself. is it really likely that she was a real ripper victim?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: