Victim photos

[John Bennett]

Also bear in mind that it was the Police's desire to remove the bodies from the crime scenes as soon as possible - as they were in public places, the need to reduce the risk of too many onlookers would have been paramount. Having to wait for a cameraman and then wait for the picture to be taken would have just prolonged things too much.

With Kelly being found in her room, the crime scene was conveniently sealed from the public gaze, no doubt allowing for more time to indulge in the photographic process.

[cappuccina]

I believe it was very cloudy and "drizzly" the day they were photographing MJK's body, and may have even been raining, so there would have been "light" issues. Those photos are quite remarkable for the time, actually.

[Rob Clack]

I raised a similar question to this on an Eddowes thread some months back, cant recall the exact name.

Rob Clack made the valid point that photographing a body outside was rather more technical in those days. Youll have to ask Rob the details as I glaze over when he gets technical, however its due to conditions and the equipment available.

Monty

I think it was the problem of available light. A flash couldn't be used as the powder would have fallen out of the holder which is why the photos we do have of the victims they are being propped standing up. Kellys photos are at an angle and not full on like the others.

Rob

[Monty]

Hi,
Valied points, however it still doesnt explain why the police did not continue to photograph further suspected ripper victims in situ after Kelly.
Perhaps Im hinting that the police knew that later victims were not the work of JTR, and that she was the last to die at his hands, otherwise they would have continued to use this new policing technique.

I raised a similar question to this on an Eddowes thread some months back, cant recall the exact name.

Rob Clack made the valid point that photographing a body outside was rather more technical in those days. Youll have to ask Rob the details as I glaze over when he gets technical, however its due to conditions and the equipment available.

Monty

[Defective Detective]

Hi Defective,

In some ways, this is nostalgically reminiscent of the legendary "Eddowes in a boat" thread - find it by clicking here. She's in a shell.

Regards,

Mark

Huh. Strange that, I'd never heard of that practice before. I concede that it was taken in a shell before the autopsy. There's still 'something' about it to me, though. Who knows.

[tnb]

Hi Defective,

In some ways, this is nostalgically reminiscent of the legendary "Eddowes in a boat" thread - find it by clicking here. She's in a shell.

Regards,

Mark

Thread and a half that one was, Mark. Happy days.

[m_w_r]

And immediately to the right of her head is what looks to me like some sort of plant growth.

Hi Defective,

In some ways, this is nostalgically reminiscent of the legendary "Eddowes in a boat" thread - find it by clicking here. She's in a shell.

Regards,

Mark

[Stephen Thomas]

Hi Spyglass

Except that the police did photograph MacKenzie and Coles.

[Defective Detective]

I always thought that this photograph of Kate Eddowes was taken in situ:



It was at the least taken before she was sewn shut, as evinced by the gaping wounds under her sternum and around her throat. And immediately to the right of her head is what looks to me like some sort of plant growth. Perhaps some of you who know more about it can shed greater light on this subject for me.

[spyglass]

Hi,
Valied points, however it still doesnt explain why the police did not continue to photograph further suspected ripper victims in situ after Kelly.
Perhaps Im hinting that the police knew that later victims were not the work of JTR, and that she was the last to die at his hands, otherwise they would have continued to use this new policing technique.

[Pontius2000]

plus, they waited several hours before going in because several of them thought the dogs were coming, so there was ample time for the camera to get to the scene. as well as being indoors, so they didn't have to worry about the curious crowd gawking over the body.

[Madam Red]

Very intriguing idea.
Perhaps it's merely a coincidence that the camera was available that morning. I highly doubt the police would've known in advance of the murder.

[spyglass]

Hi all!
It has proberbly been talked about before, however something came to mind today concerning the photographing of Mary Kelly's murder scene.
This murder was deemed important enough to be the first to be photographed in situ, and yet this new trend did not seem to be repeated with further victims that some concidered to be at the time by some police officers, commited by JTR.

When you read all the accounts, it would seem the police were all ready and waiting with camera and were quickly called in to action. Yet with further murders this action was not called for.
Just seems a little odd to me...any thoughts ?