If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Would It Be The Job of the Police Or the Grand Jury to Discredit Schwartz's Testimony
"[W]as that the job of the police or was it their job to see that all evidence was presented to the grand jury so that they could determine its value and reach an appropriate conclusion?"
The latter, I should think. They did, however, check out statements.
I take it you have seen why the Leman lads were skeptical of the story?
"Obviously, I am assuming that they would not allow evidence to be presented that they clearly knew was false."
Agreed. Just look at the caution Mrs. Maxwell got at inquest, the rebuff offered to Eliza Gold, and the correction of John Kelly regarding his boots.
I probably didn't state that too well. What I meant is if the police could not disprove his story outright but had serious doubts as to its veracity would they withhold it or present it and let the grand jury determine how much weight they wanted to give it? Hope that makes sense.
Would It Be The Job of the Police Or the Grand Jury to Discredit Schwartz's Testimony
People have stated that Schwartz did not testify at the inquest thereby implying that his account had been discredited by the police. But was that the job of the police or was it their job to see that all evidence was presented to the grand jury so that they could determine its value and reach an appropriate conclusion?
Obviously, I am assuming that they would not allow evidence to be presented that they clearly new was false.
Leave a comment: