Arbeter Fraint's Take

[Cogidubnus]

Hi Rob

Bearing in mind the total lack of reference to him, in what is after all the most contemporary and relevant work, and in the following issue too, did Schwartz even exist?

Dave

[Debra A]

Which particular grape remains are you seeking Lynn? If they're seedless grapes and you don't eat the skins (I believe that was the so-called "ladylike" habit of the times) then what identifiable remains would there be...I suspect (not for the first time) we need some pathological assistance!

Dave

Well, this doctor managed to spot some

[Rob Clack]

Interesting article.
I think it fairly clear from reading it that Schwartz was not a member of the club and had no connection to it in anyway. It would also rule out Wess being Schwartz's interpreter.

Rob

[Wickerman]

Hello Jon.

"There are no firm answers to many questions, regardless of who tells you otherwise"

But there MUST be; else, why bother?

Cheers.
LC

Because Lynn, its what keeps the fires burning.

Regards, Jon S.

[Cogidubnus]

Absolutely Lynn

[lynn cates]

agree

Hello Dave. Thanks. But at least we agree that there was someone from the club with eyes open?

Cheers.
LC

[Cogidubnus]

Hello Dave. Maharajah wish; I wish. Here you go, Sahib.

Hi Lynn...I see the guy from the club doorway as a witness rather than a perpetrator...but interesting nonetheless!

By the way I love your LVP disguise!

Thanks
Dave

[lynn cates]

The answer is . . .

Hello Jon.

"There are no firm answers to many questions, regardless of who tells you otherwise"

But there MUST be; else, why bother?

Cheers.
LC

[Wickerman]

Ah yes the Ultima Bullshita anti-grape argument...I never heard of a blood clot which looked like a bunch of grapes...haemorrhoids yes...but not a blood clot!

Sorry!

Dave

No-one has Dave. Not even me who worked as a butchers apprentice for three years many moons ago, and had my hands in congealed blood every day.
Its the result of a vivid imagination (sorry Christer) with some, or desperation with others.

Regards, Jon S.

[lynn cates]

Sometimes a Sahib has got to act like a Sahib.

Hello Dave. Maharajah wish; I wish. Here you go, Sahib.

Cheers.
LC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a95rqNxxbiM

[Cogidubnus]

The answer is a lemon...

There are no firm answers to many questions, regardless of who tells you otherwise

Hoo bloody ray...And so say all of us...

Thanks Jon!

Dave

[Wickerman]

I really hope you're meaning this ironically Lynn, though I now know what to buy Wickerman for Xmas. (Hint: It's a fruit.)

Actually Maria, my wife is the health food nut, give me meat & potatoes anyday

By the by, Lynn and Cogidubnus, there are various threads here on casebook about the grapes, just type “grapes“ in the search function.

Since 1998 at least, we have debated the GSG, Anderson's Witness, whether Kelly was a Ripper victim, which "Ripper letter" might have been real, and whether "Jack" was one killer, or several, and other stuff.
There are no firm answers to many questions, regardless of who tells you otherwise

Regards, Jon S.

[Cogidubnus]

Easy

If I accept AF as the definitive evidence, do I really need to?

Nonetheless, she's drifted there with boyfriend, who says "hang on love, there's a guy I've got to see" ... left alone, she turns toward the light, gets her prezzies out and starts looking at them feeling self-satisfied...boyfriend gets her, maybe from behind...

Someone did that, or something similar...Now YOU Lynn...give me your version!

Thanks

Dave

[lynn cates]

scenario

Hello Dave.

"She has pockets...if she wants to eat the grapes she can tuck the candies away pro-tem...(someone's bought the poor woman not one but two or three treats (the flower too?) and she's excited...she can't believe her luck, and keeps bringing out her treasure to look at it...seems natural to me."

OK. Can you construct a sequence--with or without others--in which Liz:

1. Goes into the yard.

2. Turns East and begins to walk out.

3. Pulls out both her treats.

4. Is suddenly cut?

Cheers.
LC

[lynn cates]

Por que no?

Hello Jon.

"The police should have looked on the footpath opposite Dutfields Yard where the couple were supposed to have been standing for a while."

Are we sure they did not?

Cheers.
LC