Originally posted by mariab
View Post
There is another possibility... and it is what the police seemed to surmise; that Schwartz may have been telling the truth, but the incident he described could have been a bellicose drunk acosting her and then, going on his way; with someone else (the killer) coming upon her afterwards. A woman in Stride's position could be approached by several men in a short time; whether she was soliciting or not. The pubs had closed and many men were 'crawling' their way home. Indeed, they believed that she had likely been seen in the company of several men within an hour an a half before she was murdered. This was in Swanson's report and he had to rely on Abberline for the information and insight - as the 'Lipsky' explaination incures. Abberline would have known the district and its people far better than we could ever hope to do now.
As far as the Echo article is concerned... one must be cautious about the press - unless it is a direct quote; especially the Echo or the Star and certainly in the immediate aftermath of an event when the rumor mill is rampant and the inquest hasn't gotten under way. As Tom suggested, Wiess could have gotten his information garbled and the reporter could have further embellished it. They were more interested in selling papers than checking their facts. It would get even worse after the Kelly murder.
And, the club members - particularly Wiess and Eagle? Having Stride killed on their very doorstep would be like finding a turd in your kitchen sink... given the nature of the club and the social climate of the time. Its hard for me to believe that not one member saw Stride before she was found dead in their yard. Whether they were complicite or not, its easy to understand why they said they didn't see her or any prostitutes around the premises... even though their neighbor at No. 38 told a different story. "I do not think the yard bears a very good character at night..."
Leave a comment: