What evidence tells us that Kidney and BS man did not look like each other? My suggestion is that there is no such evidence about
A police document from the actual investigation exists. The document was authored by the head of the investigating team. Said document describes a man with a small moustache.
A contemporary drawing of Kidney exists, by an artist, whose ability to draw a recognisable likeness can be tested. Said drawing shows Kidney with a large moustache.
Ergo, tangible evidence.
It is true witness accounts can be unreliable but in this case Kidney presented a high media profile, giving ample opportunity for recognition by ANY witness. Unless anyone has actual evidence, of the above quality and provenance, what is the reason for assuming Kidney and Schwartz’s man are one and the same?
What do you use to assert that Kidney - SPECIFICALLY - was looked into by the police, and what exact information can you give us on his alibi...
A far more significant question is, why would anyone assume the “acquaintances” checked by police would not –SPECICALLY- include Kidney?
...Is it not true that the alibi - if it existed - may have been "I was asleep"?
Equally, is it not true his alibi may have been, “I was at work”?
Whatever it was, it satisfied the iunvestigators enough for the senior officer to feel Kidney was not worth of specific attention in his memo.
A police document from the actual investigation exists. The document was authored by the head of the investigating team. Said document describes a man with a small moustache.
A contemporary drawing of Kidney exists, by an artist, whose ability to draw a recognisable likeness can be tested. Said drawing shows Kidney with a large moustache.
Ergo, tangible evidence.
It is true witness accounts can be unreliable but in this case Kidney presented a high media profile, giving ample opportunity for recognition by ANY witness. Unless anyone has actual evidence, of the above quality and provenance, what is the reason for assuming Kidney and Schwartz’s man are one and the same?
What do you use to assert that Kidney - SPECIFICALLY - was looked into by the police, and what exact information can you give us on his alibi...
A far more significant question is, why would anyone assume the “acquaintances” checked by police would not –SPECICALLY- include Kidney?
...Is it not true that the alibi - if it existed - may have been "I was asleep"?
Equally, is it not true his alibi may have been, “I was at work”?
Whatever it was, it satisfied the iunvestigators enough for the senior officer to feel Kidney was not worth of specific attention in his memo.
Comment