Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Elizabeth's murder and the double event

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Mark J D View Post

    So when The Star prints that "The Hungarian states positively that he saw a knife in this second man's hand...", you're saying that they didn't just slip in a little word that their interviewee didn't say, but actually cranked it up to 11 wth a 'states positively'? And for no meaningful reason other than to give a foreign Jewish nobody an excuse for buggering off in panic as a woman was assaulted next to him? How uncharacteristically generous of yellow journalism to cut a guy so much slack!

    This just won't wash. 'Schwartz' himself -- or the bilingual ventriloquist operating him -- went further and wilder with the press because he knew there'd be none of the repercussions there'd have been had he piled the horseshit that high in front of the police. The agenda, however, is the same in both cases.

    M.
    The point is that whether or not the police and/or press version of Schwartz's statement accurately reflects Schwartz's words, nothing in either indicates that BS man didn't go into the club, other than that one would have reason to doubt that someone shouting "Lipsky" would then go into a Jewish club.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by Lewis C View Post

      The point is that whether or not the police and/or press version of Schwartz's statement accurately reflects Schwartz's words, nothing in either indicates that BS man didn't go into the club, other than that one would have reason to doubt that someone shouting "Lipsky" would then go into a Jewish club.
      'Didn't go into the club'? What I said was 'didn't attempt to go in the door'.

      I'm not wasting time on this.

      M.
      (Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by Mark J D View Post
        The agenda, however, is the same in both cases.
        -- Specifically: 'Schwartz' has the job of packaging for the police and the public 'witness reports' which establish by way of a confected mix of statement, hint and implication that Stride was attacked by a man who had been walking towards the club but wasn't going there; who hadn't come out of the club; who wasn't anything to do with the club, and definitely, definitely, definitely wasn't Jewish.

        M.
        Last edited by Mark J D; 03-09-2024, 12:05 PM.
        (Image of Charles Allen Lechmere is by artist Ashton Guilbeaux. Used by permission. Original art-work for sale.)

        Comment


        • #79
          " ...definitely, definitely, definitely wasn't Jewish."

          How does anybody read the broad shouldered man as definitely not Jewish?
          dustymiller
          aka drstrange

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Mark J D View Post

            'Didn't go into the club'? What I said was 'didn't attempt to go in the door'.

            I'm not wasting time on this.

            M.
            How is one different from the other?

            Comment


            • #81
              Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post

              How does anybody read the broad shouldered man as definitely not Jewish?
              Definitely is a big claim, but probably isn't, given that Pipeman's name almost definitely was not Lipski.
              Andrew's the man, who is not blamed for nothing

              Comment

              Working...
              X